共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 343 毫秒
1.
基于T/P 和Jason-1 高度计数据的渤黄东海潮汐信息提取 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
对19 a 的TOPEX/POSEIDON(以下称T/P)和Jason-1 卫星高度计测高数据进行调和分析, 得到渤黄东海海域的8 个主要分潮(M2、S2、N2、K2、K1、O1、P1 和Q1)。提出一种将两类卫星高度计数据统一的方法, 消除了因两类卫星高度计校正算法等不同所导致的相互之间的偏差。变轨后的T/P与Jason-1 卫星加密了高度计对潮汐观测的空间分布。通过对交叉点处升轨与降轨的潮汐调和分析结果进行比较, 检验调和分析方法及高度计数据的可靠性; 将基于高度计数据的调和分析结果与验潮站资料进行比较, 以检验其正确性。4 个主要分潮(M2、S2、K1、O1)振幅之差的均方根介于1.0~1.8 cm, 迟角之差的均方根介于4.1°~7.8°。与已有研究结果相比, 调和分析结果的精确性有所提高。在此基础上, 综合变轨前后两类高度计测高数据的调和分析结果, 给出并分析了渤黄东海4 个主要分潮的同潮图。 相似文献
2.
对3颗高度计卫星TOPEX/POSEIDON(TP),Jason-1(J1),Jason-2(J2)自1992—2011年683个重复周期,共18.6年的数据进行分析,得到全球海洋潮汐调和常数,并重点分析了采用不同样本大小的卫星高度计数据对潮汐信息提取的准度和精度所带来的影响。研究结果表明,参与分析的卫星高度计数据观测样本数的增加可以降低其反演潮汐各分潮振幅时的误差。观测时间为18.6年的高度计数据调和分析所得的主要半日分潮与实测比较,其振幅差相比于利用10年数据的计算结果减小约0.5cm;但是由于忽略了卫星更替过程所带来的观测时间差来进行调和分析,将会对计算分析过程中产生的迟角误差造成影响,主要全日分潮的迟角误差增加约2°,而半日潮迟角误差的改变则比较小。本文进一步用理想化实验解释了造成这种迟角计算误差变化的原因,比较了轨道交叉点上,由卫星在升轨和降轨2个轨道上各自的观测数据计算得到的调和常数,发现随着参与分析的高度计观测样本数的增加,调和分析计算潮汐调和常数时的内符精度也会显著提高。利用18.6年数据比利用10年数据进行调和分析时,主要半日潮调和常数的精度提高了约7%。 相似文献
3.
随着卫星高度计资料的不断丰富,通过对卫星高度计所得潮汐调和常数进行插值或拟合得到潮汐同潮图成为可能。本文拟对T/P(TOPEX/POSEIDON)、Jason-1和Jason-2卫星高度计数据进行分析,得到南海区域星下观测点处四个主要分潮(M2、S2、K1和O1分潮)的调和常数,进而利用双调和样条插值方法对其进行插值,获取南海同潮图。首先,以1992～2016年T/P和Jason卫星高度计所得海面高度数据为基础,利用调和分析方法计算了南海星下观测点处M2、S2、K1和O1四个主要分潮的调和常数,并与40个验潮站数据进行了对比,最大矢量均差为4.99cm,说明分析所得调和常数与利用验潮站资料提取的调和常数的误差较小。进而采用双调和样条插值方法对星下点调和常数进行插值,得到了南海四个主要分潮的同潮图,所得结果与全球潮汐模型TPXO7.2模式结果的矢量均差分别为4.69、2.46、3.13和2.42 cm,与141个验潮站处观测结果的矢量均差分别为22.59、10.26、10.24和8.51 cm。此外,插值所得四个主要分潮的无潮点位置与前人研究结果相近。上述实验结果表明:利用双调和样条插值方法对卫星高度计所得调和常数进行插值能够获取较为准确的同潮图。 相似文献
4.
我国HY-2B卫星已成功运行3 a多,本文首次将HY-2B测高数据用于计算潮汐。将HY-2B与相同时间段的Jason-3在东中国海分别进行潮汐信息提取,验证了其结果的一致性。建立了基于10颗国内外卫星高度计(TOPEX/Poseidon、Jason-1、Jason-2、Jason-3、ENVISAT、ERS-1、ERS-2、Sentinel-3A、Sentinel-3B、HY-2B)数据的时间序列,得到东中国海近30 a时间序列的较高空间分辨率网格化海面高度。利用该数据提取了东中国海12个分潮(O1、K1、Q1、P1、M2、S2、N2、K2、SA、SSa、Mm、Mf)的潮汐调和常数,并将4个主要分潮M2、S2、K1、O1的调和常数与验潮站进行对比,均方根误差分别为6.74 cm、3.98 cm、2.37 cm、1.81 cm,总体均方根误差为8.32 cm;同时,采用除HY-2B之外的剩余9颗国外卫星高度计数据和TPXO9潮汐模型结果分别与验潮站对比,结果显示,加入HY-2B后的10颗卫星高度计反演潮汐结果准确度最高,与不使用HY-2B卫星数据相比,全日潮有较大改善,K1和O1向量均方根误差分别降低19.93%和17.35%,4个主要分潮总体均方根误差降低3.5%。此外,通过与FVCOM模式结果对比分析,4个主要分潮的调和常数与模式结果的总体均方根误差为8.86 cm。另一方面,空间分辨率也有所提高,达到了0.1°×0.1°。最后,给出了4个主要分潮同潮图。在潮差较大的朝鲜半岛西侧,加入HY-2B后的同潮图可显示出2.1 m的M2等振幅线与0.75 m的S2等振幅线,与该海域实际观测结果一致,说明HY-2B在近海潮汐信息提取中有相当重要的作用。 相似文献
5.
针对应用高度计数据建立的海潮模型在浅海海域精度较低的现状,提出采用移去-恢复技术联合利用19a T/P、Jason-1卫星原始轨道、变轨轨道高度计数据建立南海浅海海域高精度潮汐模型的方法。处理卫星高度计数据时以平均海平面为基准面,按纬差0.1°间隔采用沿迹分析提取南海海域原始轨道2 184个正常点和变轨轨道1 626个正常点;分别对原始轨道、变轨轨道正常点进行调和分析以及响应分析,得到潮汐主要分潮调和常数;进一步建立网格潮汐模型,讨论了不同分辨率潮汐模型的精度差异。基于验潮站数据集结果运用移去-恢复技术对所建潮汐模型进行改进,改进后潮汐模型4个最主要分潮O_1,K_1,M_2和S_2的RMS分别提高至7.76,9.40,13.86和8.51cm,RSS达到20.32cm,表明移去-恢复技术能够明显改善潮汐模型在浅海海域的精度。 相似文献
6.
基于18.6年卫星高度计资料对南海潮汐的分析与研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
利用TOPEX/Poseidon,Jason-1/2共18.6年卫星高度计资料(含变轨后资料),采用最小二乘调和分析法,提取南海12个分潮(Sa,Ssa,Mm,Mf,Q1,O1,P1,K1,N2,M2,S2和K2)调和常数,与沿岸及岛屿58个验潮站数据拟合较好。结果表明,采用更长时间序列的卫星高度计数据,尤其是增加变轨后的资料,分析所得结果得到明显改善。结合沿岸及岛屿264个验潮站数据,绘制4个主要分潮(M2,S2,K1和O1)的等振幅线和同潮时线,较好的展现了南海潮汐分布特征。 相似文献
7.
8.
利用TOPEX/Poseidon卫星高度计资料提取黄海、东海潮汐信息的研究 总被引：4，自引：3，他引：4
为了更好地利用卫星测高数据分析黄海和东海的潮汐特性 ,对 1 993— 1 999年期间的TOPEX/Poseidon测高数据进行了质量控制和共线平差处理。在此基础上 ,在黄海、东海选取了 1 738个测高点 ,用最小二乘拟合法计算出 1 2个分潮的调和常数。计算得出的M2 和m1分潮的调和常数 ,在交叉点评估的内符精度振幅分别为 2 4cm和 0 8cm ,迟角分别为 2 3°和2 5°。测高点与附近验潮站的这两个分潮结果相比 ,振幅的均方根误差小于 4cm ,而迟角相差较大。这可能与验潮站的地理环境因素有关。用卫星测高数据算得的调和常数绘制的主要分潮特性图与现有常规观测得到的相应图进行了比较 ,在外海深水区两者符合较好 ;近岸由于卫星测高误差较大 ,所以两者符合差。 相似文献
9.
基于与Jason-2数据比对的Jason-3卫星高度计全球数据质量评估 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Jason-3卫星高度计于2016年1月17日成功发射，2016年2月12日进入预定轨道，与Jason-2高度计同轨进入编队飞行阶段，并落后Jason-2高度计约1分20秒，两者相距约560 km。2016年9月1日，Jason-2高度计变换轨道，编队飞行阶段结束，两高度计进入平行轨道，以增加卫星高度计对地观测的空间覆盖。本研究主要开展了Jason-3高度计的数据质量的评估与检验，包括Jason-3高度计数据可用性和有效性的验证，以及Jason-3高度计和校正辐射计各参数的数据质量监测。重点开展了Jason-2与Jason-3高度计各项参数的综合比较，利用Jason-2与Jason-3高度计编队飞行阶段的数据精确评估了两高度计参数的一致性，并从全球数据角度分析了Jason-3高度计获取各参数的能力以及稳定性；通过与Jason-2互交叉点比较分析评估Jason-3高度计海面高度数据质量情况，验证Jason-3高度计数据精度。结果表明，Jason-3高度计的数据质量满足高度计测高的要求，具有与Jason-1、Jason-2、T/P等高度计相同或更高的测高精度以监测全球海平面变化，此外，Jason-3有效波高参数数据质量明显优于Jason-2高度计。 相似文献
10.
利用苏门答腊附近海域T/P、Jason-1测高卫星近20年的海面高连续观测资料,分别计算了该区域(80°E~105°E,5°S~20°N)在2004年苏门答腊大地震前后的海面高变化趋势,并与该区域对应时间段GRACE重力卫星反演的地表质量迁移结果进行比较。研究结果表明,由卫星测高观测资料估算的震区地震前后海平面趋势的变化与卫星重力反演结果基本一致。由于卫星测高沿轨观测具有高精度、高时空分辨率的特性,卫星测高资料估算的海平面趋势变化可以更为准确地反映震区海平面变化的局部特征。还对该区域震后形变特征进行了初步分析。 相似文献
11.
Jason-1 global statistical evaluation and performance assessment: Calibration and cross-calibration results 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
Since Jason-1launch, extensive validation of Jason-1 data and cross-calibration relative to TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) have been performed by the CLS validation team within the CNES Jason-1 project. These validation activities are routinely operated as part of the Jason-1 ground segment, and often lead to in-depth studies to understand all validation conclusions. This paper presents the main results in terms of Jason-1 data quality: verification of data availability and validity, monitoring of the most relevant altimeter and radiometer parameters, assessment of the Jason-1 altimeter system performances. From global statistical analysis of more than 2 years of Jason-1 GDR data, results for all components of the altimeter measurement are derived in terms of bias, trend and precision. This work also represents a contribution to the estimation of the Jason-1 error budget. Thorough studies have been more focused on specific issues in relation to data quality: this is the case for the analysis of the high frequency content of the Jason-1 data and its impact on the T/P to Jason-1 comparison. From the results presented in this paper, it is demonstrated that the Jason-1 mission fulfils the requirements of high precision altimetry. In particular, it allows continuing the observation of the Mean Sea Level (MSL) variations at the same accuracy as T/P, which was one of the challenges of the Jason-1 mission. Potential improvements and open issues are also identified, with the objective of still making progress in terms of altimeter data quality. 相似文献
12.
Jason-1 global statistical evaluation and performance assessment: Calibration and cross-calibration results 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Since Jason-1launch, extensive validation of Jason-1 data and cross-calibration relative to TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) have been performed by the CLS validation team within the CNES Jason-1 project. These validation activities are routinely operated as part of the Jason-1 ground segment, and often lead to in-depth studies to understand all validation conclusions. This paper presents the main results in terms of Jason-1 data quality: verification of data availability and validity, monitoring of the most relevant altimeter and radiometer parameters, assessment of the Jason-1 altimeter system performances. From global statistical analysis of more than 2 years of Jason-1 GDR data, results for all components of the altimeter measurement are derived in terms of bias, trend and precision. This work also represents a contribution to the estimation of the Jason-1 error budget. Thorough studies have been more focused on specific issues in relation to data quality: this is the case for the analysis of the high frequency content of the Jason-1 data and its impact on the T/P to Jason-1 comparison. From the results presented in this paper, it is demonstrated that the Jason-1 mission fulfils the requirements of high precision altimetry. In particular, it allows continuing the observation of the Mean Sea Level (MSL) variations at the same accuracy as T/P, which was one of the challenges of the Jason-1 mission. Potential improvements and open issues are also identified, with the objective of still making progress in terms of altimeter data quality. 相似文献
13.
HY-2 A (Haiyang-2 A) satellite was launched on August 16, 2011 and radar altimeter is one of its main payloads. We reprocessed two years of HY-2 A altimeter sensor geophysical dataset records (SGDR) data. This paper presents the main results in terms of reprocessed HY-2 A altimeter data quality: verification of data availability and validity, monitoring several relevant altimeter parameters, and assessment of the HY-2 A altimeter system performances. A cross-calibration analysis of reprocessed HY-2 A altimeter data with Jason-2 was conducted. The reprocessed HY-2 A altimeter data show good quality and have a low level of noise with respect to Jason-2. The same geophysical correction methods were used to calculate the sea surface height (SSH) for the two missions. The mean standard deviations of the crossover differences for HY-2 A and Jason-2 are 5.24 cm and 5.34 cm, respectively. The mean standard deviation of the crossover differences between HY-2 A and Jason-2 is 5.37 cm. These show that HY-2 A can provide SSH measurements at almost the same level of accuracy as Jason-2. The relative SSH bias between HY-2 A and Jason-2 due to the Ultra Stable Oscillator (USO) drift is obviously observed, and it can affect the calculation of mean sea level and should be further studied and corrected. 相似文献
14.
HY-2A卫星雷达高度计数据的全球统计评价及质量分析 总被引：6，自引：4，他引：2
自HY-2A卫星发射以来,针对HY-2A卫星雷达高度计产品的交叉定标、真实性检验及质量评估工作一直在持续开展。本文主要以HY-2A卫星高度计第44周期的IGDR产品数据为例,通过使用全球分布图、二维直方图和每日均值统计的方法完成了与Jason-2IGDR产品的比对验证,同时对主要环境校正参数及地球物理产品的数据质量稳定性进行了分析,结果显示高度计产品数据质量较稳定,此外利用HY-2A卫星升降轨交叉点海面高度差、与Jason-2卫星交叉点海面高度差以及沿轨海平面异常数据分析的方法进行了HY-2A卫星高度计观测系统的性能评估,结果显示,HY-2A卫星海面高度精度约为7.48cm,精度接近Jason-2,能满足海洋应用与科学研究的需要。 相似文献
15.
16.
中国HY-2卫星雷达高度计有效波高真实性检验 总被引：9，自引：5，他引：4
Chinese Haiyang-2(HY-2) satellite is the first Chinese marine dynamic environment satellite. The dual-frequency(Ku and C band) radar altimeter onboard HY-2 has been working effective to provide operational significant wave height(SWH) for more than three years(October 1, 2011 to present).We validated along-track Ku-band SWH data of HY-2 satellite against National Data Buoy Center(NDBC) in-situ measurements over a time period of three years from October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2014, the root mean square error(RMSE) and mean bias of HY-2SWH is 0.38 m and(–0.13±0.35) m, respectively. We also did cross validation against Jason-2 altimeter SWH data,the RMSE and the mean bias is 0.36 m and(–0.22±0.28) m, respectively. In order to compare the statistical results between HY-2 and Jason-2 satellite SWH data, we validated the Jason-2 satellite radar altimeter along-track Ku-band SWH data against NDBC measurements using the same method. The results demonstrate the validation method in this study is scientific and the RMSE and mean bias of Jason-2 SWH data is 0.26 m and(0.00±0.26) m,respectively. We also validated both HY-2 and Jason-2 SWH data every month, the mean bias of Jason-2 SWH data almost equaled to zero all the time, while the mean bias of HY-2 SWH data was no less than –0.31 m before April2013 and dropped to zero after that time. These results indicate that the statistical results for HY-2 altimeter SWH are reliable and HY-2 altimeter along-track SWH data were steady and of high quality in the last three years. The results also indicate that HY-2 SWH data have greatly been improved and have the same accuracy with Jason-2SWH data after April, 2013. SWH data provided by HY-2 satellite radar altimeter are useful and acceptable for ocean operational applications. 相似文献
17.
This article describes an “absolute” calibration of Jason-1 (J-1) altimeter sea surface height bias using a method developed for TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) bias determination reported previously. The method makes use of U.K. tide gauges equipped with Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers to measure sea surface heights at the same time, and in the same geocentric reference frame, as Jason-1 altimetric heights recorded in the nearby ocean. The main time-dependent components of the observed altimeter-minus-gauge height-difference time series are due to the slightly different ocean tides at the gauge and in the ocean. The main harmonic coefficients of the tide differences are calculated from analysis of the copious TOPEX data set and then applied to the determination of T, P, and J-1 bias in turn. Datum connections between the tide gauge and altimetric sea surface heights are made by means of precise, local geoid differences from the EGG97 model. By these means, we have estimated Jason-1 altimeter bias determined from Geophysical Data Record (GDR) data for cycles 1–61 to be 12.9 cm, with an accuracy estimated to be approximately 3 cm on the basis of our earlier work. This J-1 bias value is in close agreement with those determined by other groups, which provides a further confirmation of the validity of our method and of its potential for application in other parts of the world where suitable tide gauge, GPS, and geoid information exist. 相似文献
18.
We present the results of retracking 18 cycles (15 from the Jason-TOPEX collinear period) of Jason-1 data. We used the retracking method of Rodriguez which simultaneously solves for all relevant waveform parameters using a 26 Gaussian model of the altimeter point target response. We find significant differences from the Jason-1 Project retracking in the key parameters of range and significant wave height (SWH) in the second version of the Project SGDRs. The differences from the Jason-1 data have a strong dependence on off-nadir angle and some dependence on SWH. The dependence of range on SWH is what is called sea state bias. The retracking technique also estimates surface skewness. For Jason-1 with its very clean waveforms we make the first direct estimates of the skewness effect on altimeter data. We believe that the differences found here and thus in overall sea surface height are the result of the standard project processing using a single Gaussian approximation to the Point Target Response (PTR) and not solving simultaneously for off nadir angle. We believe that the relatively large sea state bias errors estimated empirically for Jason-1 during the cal/val phase result from sensitivity of quantities, particularly SWH, in project GDRs to off nadir angle. The TOPEX-Jason-1 bias can be determined only when a full retracking of Jason-1 is done for the collinear period. 相似文献