共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
《福建地震》2000,(Z1)
一、地震基本参数表1 地震基本参数表发震时间年月日时分秒震 中 位 置微 观宏 观东经北纬东经北纬参考地名震级(ＭＬ)震源深度(Ｋｍ)震中烈度 地震类型 198809180734241116°25′25°54′116°24′25°55′长汀铁长3952Ⅴ小震群 本次地震的宏观震中位于长汀县铁长乡芦地村的石元头一带,在微观震中的西北方向3公里处(见图11-1)。二、地震烈度分布通过对福建长汀,江西瑞金、石城等地的8条路线、37个调查点的考察,勾划出39级主震的烈度分布图(图11-1)。图11-1 1988年9月18日长汀铁长地震等震线图Ⅴ度区:极震区。Ⅴ度等震线东抵长… 相似文献
6.
7.
云南地处青藏高原东南缘，发育众多活动断裂，是典型的历史强震多发区。1588年通海- 曲江7. 0级地震发生在近南北向小江断裂带与北西向曲江断裂的交汇部位。前人基于该处曲江断裂行迹较明显，活动性较强，并且具有发生7级以上大震的潜能，多认为其为该地震的发震断层。但本文在重新梳理地震史料基础上，通过遥感解译和地表调查，发现小江断裂带南段西支并未被曲江断裂截断，而是错断并穿过曲江断裂继续南延。结合对曲江断裂7级以上地震复发能力的计算，笔者认为1588年通海- 曲江7. 0地震的发震构造并非曲江断裂，而是小江断裂带西支的南延段落。同时，根据烈度- 震级关系式和地表破裂长度- 震级的关系式计算得到1588年通海- 曲江地震的震级只有6. 5级左右，其强度可能被高估。基于新的调查研究结果，进一步对小江断裂带南端的活动构造格局及未来地震危险性进行重新分析后认为，小江断裂带南段与北西向的曲江断裂和石屏断裂之间存在相互切割限制的关系。两组断裂交汇部位常常是拉分盆地的发育部位，形成有高大谷地，曲江盆地和建水盆地等。重新梳理该区震中烈度≥Ⅸ度的历史地震发现，小江断裂带南段东支建水以北是该区显著的历史地震空区，在未来的防震减灾工作中需给与更多关注。 相似文献
8.
《福建地震》2000,(Z1)
一、地震基本参数表1 地震基本参数表发震时间年月日时分秒震 中 位 置微 观宏 观东经北纬东经北纬参考地名震级(ＭＬ)震源深度(Ｋｍ)震中烈度 地震类型 197701091153511177°249°1177°249°长泰坂里371926Ⅴ主震型 微观震中定位于安溪龙涓的半林附近,宏观震中确定在长泰坂里的黄西坑,在前者西南面5公里左右。表中的震级为全省的平均值ＭＬ=37级。依据宏观烈度分布图,采用古登堡与李希特以及马德里的计算公式,得出的震源深度分别为19Ｋｍ和26Ｋｍ。图3-1 1977年1月9日长泰坂里地震等震线图二、地震烈度分布从图3-1可以看出,宏… 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
2017年8月8日21时19分,四川阿坝州九寨沟县发生7.0级地震,震中位于巴颜喀拉块体东边界虎牙断裂和东昆仑断裂带东段塔藏断裂交汇区域,地震构造背景较为复杂。地震导致了房屋和道路破坏、滑坡崩塌。根据高分辨率卫星影像解译、阶地坎变形的测量和测年数据得到：塔藏断裂东段晚第四纪以来以左旋走滑为主,兼逆分量,水平滑动速率为2.7~4.1 mm/yr,垂直滑动速率为0.56~0.6 mm/yr。结合此次地震的主余震分布、主震震源机制解等综合结果,初步建立了三维发震构造模型,分析认为此次地震属于走滑型地震,主破裂倾角57°~77°,发震断层可能是塔藏断裂的一条分支,是青藏高原块体向东推挤的一次地震事件。基于历史地震、活动断裂和形变观测方面的研究,巴颜喀拉块体具备显著的强震构造背景,对于该块体边界带周缘的强震活动和变形需要继续关注。 相似文献
12.
2003年青海德令哈地震序列的重新定位和发震构造 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
应用交切法对2003年4月17日德令哈地震序列的ML=6.7主震和截止至2003年10月25日的ML小于1.0级的余震,共117次地震事件进行了初始定位,并以双差地震定位法对这些地震重新进行精确定位。认为德令哈地震序列的主震震中位置为37.566°N,96.509°E,震源深度为13km,余震震源空间位置分布与哈佛大学震源机制解给出的走向为294°的节面一致。德令哈地震序列重新精确定位的结果清楚地表明了穿过震区的走向NWW—SEE、倾向NE的大柴旦—宗务隆山现代活动断裂带是这次德令哈地震序列的发震构造,同时表明该区域应力场水平最大主应力方向范围大致在N24°E—N34°E。 相似文献
13.
Soil liquefaction during the Arequipa Mw 8.4, June 23, 2001 earthquake, southern coastal Peru 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Franck A. Audemard M. Juan Carlos Gmez Hernando J. Tavera Nuris Orihuela G. 《Engineering Geology》2005,78(3-4):237-255
The Arequipa June 23, 2001, earthquake with a moment magnitude of Mw 8.4 struck southern Peru, northern Chile and western Bolivia. This shallow (29 km deep) interplate event, occurring in the coupled zone of the Nazca subduction next to the southeast of the subducting Nazca ridge, triggered very localized but widely outspread soil liquefaction. Although sand blows and lateral spreading of river banks and road bridge abutments were observed 390 km away from the epicenter in the southeast direction (nearing the town of Tacna, close to the Chile border), liquefaction features were only observed in major river valleys and delta and coastal plains in the meizoseismal area. This was strongly controlled by the aridity along the coastal strip of Southern Peru. From the sand blow distribution along the coastal area, a first relationship of isolated sand blow diameter versus epicentral distance for a single event is ever proposed. The most significant outcome from this liquefaction field reconnaissance is that energy propagation during the main June 23, 2001, event is further supported by the distribution and size of the isolated sand blows in the meizoseismal area. The sand blows are larger to the southeast of the epicenter than its northwestern equivalents. This can be stated in other words as well. The area affected by liquefaction to the northwest is less spread out than to the southeast. Implications of these results in future paleoliquefaction investigations for earthquake magnitude and epicentral determinations are extremely important. In cases of highly asymmetrical distribution of liquefaction features such as this one, where rupture propagation tends to be mono-directional, it can be reliably determined an epicentral distance (between earthquake and liquefaction evidence) and an earthquake magnitude only if the largest sand blow is found. Therefore, magnitude estimation using this uneven liquefaction occurrence will surely lead to underrating if only the shortest side of the meizoseismal area is unluckily studied, which can eventually be the only part exhibiting liquefaction evidence, depending on the earthquake location and the distribution of liquefaction-prone environments. 相似文献
14.
15.
The 2,026 earthquake events registered by the Sichuan regional digital seismic network and mobile seismic array after the April 20 th,2013 Lushan earthquake and 28,188 pieces of data were selected to determine direct P waves arrival times. We applied the tomographic method to inverse the characteristics of the velocity structure for the three-dimensional(3D) P wave in the mid-upper crust of the seismic source region of the Lushan earthquake. The imaging results were combined with the apparent magnetization inversion and magnetotelluric(MT) sounding retest data to comprehensively study the causes of the deep seismogenic environment in the southern section of the Longmenshan fault zone and explore the formation of the Lushan earthquake. Research has shown that there are obvious differences in velocity structure and magnetic distribution between the southern and northern sections of the Longmenshan fault zone. The epicenter of the Lushan earthquake is located near the boundary of the high and low-velocity anomalies and favorable for a high-velocity section. Moreover,at the epicenter of the Lushan earthquake located on the magnetic dome boundary of Ya’an,the development of high velocity and magnetic solid medium favors the accumulation and release of strain energy. Lowvelocity anomalies are distributed underneath the are of seismogenic origin,The inversion results of the MT retest data after the April 20 th Lushan earthquake also indicate that there a high-conductor anomaly occurs under the area of seismogenic origin of the Lushan earthquake,Therefore,we speculated that the presence of a high-conductivity anomaly and low-velocity anomaly underneath the seismogenic body of the Lushan earthquake could be related to the existence of fluids. The role of fluids caused the weakening of the seismogenic layer inside the mid-upper crust and resulted in a seismogenic fault that was prone to rupture and played a triggering role in the Lushan earthquake. 相似文献
16.
滇西南2014年景谷中-强震群的地质构造成因——茶房-普文断裂带贯通过程的构造响应 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
2014年10—12月期间,云南景谷接连发生了Ms6.6、Ms5.8、Ms5.9三次中-强地震。为确定地震的地质构造成因,在地表调查的基础上,综合该区的地质构造情况、烈度与余震分布、震源机制解等资料,确定此次震群活动的宏观震中位于永平盆地东南侧山地,发震断层为地质与地貌表现不显著的NW向右旋走滑断层。此次震群活动及余震迁移过程指示,由于断层斜接部位岩桥的临时阻碍,Ms6.6地震破裂在向南东扩展过程中发生短暂停滞,突破障碍后进一步引发了Ms5.8和Ms5.9地震,这符合震源破裂沿NW向发震断裂分段破裂的行为。区域活动断裂的遥感解译结果发现,发震断层位置恰好处于NW向右旋走滑的茶房断裂与普文断裂之间,区域上属于该断裂带的不连贯部位,指示此次中-强震群活动应该是茶房-普文断裂带贯通过程的构造活动表现。结合思茅地块的历史地震资料发现,思茅地块地震活动多以小于等于6.8级为主,发震构造多为NW向断裂。指示在现今构造应力场作用下,该区NW向断裂的活动性相对NE向断裂更加显著,属于该区主要控震构造,应在今后的地震地质工作中给予更多关注。 相似文献
17.
This study's objective was to investigate the Guguan-Xiangong Fault, which lies in the southern Liupanshan area, through satellite image interpretation and field observations. Guguan-Xiangong Fault is divided into five subsegments; among these, the Badu-Longwei segment has been the most recently active. The geomorphic features of the Badu-Longwei segment are clearly displayed, including multiple high fault scarps with fresh bedrock free faces. There is significant evidence for Holocene activity of the three fault sections, located in Renhuashu, Tianjiagou, and Xinjiecun respectively. The three sections feature distinct episodic deposition and fault scratches. Based on 14 Cdating and field observations on the three fault sections, two or more paleoearthquakes across the Badu-Longwei fault segment are ascertained, between 5874±116 and 5430±140 a BP, and after 2037±83 a BP respectively. The Badu-Longwei segment of the Guguan-Xiangong Fault is preliminarily extrapolated as the seismogenic structure of the 600 A.D. Qin-Long earthquake. 相似文献
18.
2017年8月8日四川省九寨沟县发生Ms7.0级地震,构造部位处于青藏高原东缘的巴颜喀拉地块东北角,震中位置是岷江断裂、塔藏断裂、虎牙断裂和雪山梁子断裂围闭的空震区。哪条断裂发震,如何界定其与周边活动断裂的关系,与青藏高原东缘近年来发生的大地震是否有成因联系等问题对于理解该区域现今构造活动模式、预判地震发展趋势和部署地震地质灾害防控等工作具有重要意义。利用地震前后两期Sentinel-1合成孔径雷达数据对地表同震形变场进行了InSAR测量,获取了极震区约2000 km2范围内的雷达视线向变形（-13~28 cm）和运动方向,呈现为主动盘单侧走滑兼逆冲的变形模式,结合震源机制、断裂展布、构造背景和近年地震迁移的分析,揭示了控震构造是巴颜喀拉地块北缘边界断裂弧形旋转体系的尾端构造,发震断层是该断裂系中塔藏断裂的南段,并有与虎牙断裂贯通的趋势,因此,应重视本次地震与虎牙断裂之间的空震区未来的强震危险性问题;从区域上看,此次九寨沟地震可能与汶川地震具有一定的时空成因联系,因在巴颜喀拉地块南北边界断裂破裂基本贯通的条件下,2008年汶川地震诱发的东缘中部锁固破裂导致块体加速向东挤出,2013年鲁甸地震又释放了东缘南段挤压构造应力,从而进一步加剧了东北角的应力集中,促使九寨沟地震的发生。 相似文献
19.
20.
2013年8月28日、31日, 云南迪庆藏族自治州香格里拉县、德钦县、四川省甘孜藏族自治州得荣县交界地区连续发生5.1级、5.9级地震.为了查明此次地震的影响破坏程度, 进行了地震现场建筑物震害考察并对震中附近断裂进行了野外构造地质剖面调查.两次地震在短时间内并在相近位置连续发生, 造成了此次云南香格里拉、德钦-四川得荣交界地震比以往同级地震的破坏程度要高, 地震烈度最高为Ⅷ级, 有感范围大, 5.9级地震宏观震中大致处在整个灾区破坏最严重的奔子栏镇争古村一带(28.20°N, 99.36°E), 距离地震微观震中约5.1km.等震线沿德钦-中甸断裂呈北西向分布, 近似为椭球状, 结合此次地震震中附近区域现场断裂调查、震源机制解数据以及地震余震空间分布特征, 初步推断此次地震的发震构造为德钦-中甸断层, 其主要表现为一次以正断为主兼有左旋走滑错动的地震事件. 相似文献