首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 168 毫秒
1.
软土地层中当桩顶水平荷载较大时,采用传统m法计算容易低估桩身弯矩与挠曲变形,有必要针对该问题提出相关计算方法。将地基土体简化为理想弹塑性体,假定桩身某一深度处存在土体的弹塑性变形临界点,临界点以上的土体进入塑性变形状态,而临界点以下的土体仍处于弹性变形状态,分段建立桩身挠曲微分控制方程,得到水平受荷单桩简明弹塑性计算方法。现场单桩实测和参数敏感性分析结果表明:采用简明弹塑性计算方法得到的桩身最大弯矩较传统m法计算精度提高38.1%;桩身最大水平位移计算精度提高22.3%;桩顶边界条件对桩身水平位移与弯矩沿桩身的分布规律影响显著;桩身最大弯矩和水平位移对土体的极限抗力系数及其形状参数较敏感,设计中宜按下限值选取。  相似文献   

2.
李海丽  张陈蓉  卢恺 《岩土力学》2018,39(Z1):289-296
隧道开挖引起的地层不均匀沉降造成附近的地埋管线产生额外的变形,甚至破坏。被动管线与土体的相互作用的研究表明,不考虑土体的刚度衰减,较大的土体弹性模量使得管线的最大弯矩计算结果过大,偏于保守,造成不必要的浪费。在被动管线Winkler地基模型分析基础上,引入土体刚度衰减模型考虑土体非线性特性,提出了隧道开挖作用下管线响应的等效线性分析方法。基于自由土体位移场计算管周土体由于隧道开挖引起的附加应变,基于水平受荷桩的环状弹性介质模型考虑由于管土相互作用引起的管周土体应变,从而对被动Winkler地基模型的土体弹性参数进行修正,计算得到管线的最大弯矩。通过与现有的弹性理论方法、离心模型试验结果的对比,验证了针对隧道开挖引起的被动管土相互作用问题,该方法考虑土体非线性特性的合理性。  相似文献   

3.
地基土强度是影响桩土水平作用的主要因素之一。文章设计并进行物理模型试验,通过改变石膏含量控制地基土强度,模拟碎石土地基上的单桩水平载荷试验,研究地基土强度对桩顶位移、单桩承载力、桩身内力、桩前土抗力、地基抗力系数的比例系数m值的影响。试验研究表明:1石膏能显著提高土体黏聚力,但对土体内摩擦角影响不大;2地基土强度增大将显著提高单桩水平承载力与m值;3土体黏聚力与桩基设计参数m值成线性关系。  相似文献   

4.
基坑开挖时邻近桩基性状的数值分析   总被引:9,自引:1,他引:8  
陈福全  汪金卫  刘毓氚 《岩土力学》2008,29(7):1971-1976
基坑开挖时尤为关注的问题是土体侧向移动对邻近桩基的不利影响,土体的侧向移动使邻近桩基产生侧向位移和附加应力及弯矩,甚至可能使上部建筑物功能失效。采用土工有限元软件Plaxis 8.2对内支撑排桩支护基坑开挖过程进行数值模拟,分析了基坑开挖时对邻近桩基的各种影响因素,包括单排桩、双排桩在不同开挖深度、支护桩的刚度、桩基刚度、桩基距基坑开挖面距离、桩身的约束和桩长条件下桩身水平位移和弯矩的变化特性。  相似文献   

5.
李忠诚  朱小军 《岩土力学》2007,28(Z1):809-814
建立了三维数值模型,进行堆载-弹塑性地基-桩基共同作用有限元数值分析。在地面超载条件下,对自由场土体的侧向位移模式进行了探讨,得出了土体侧向变形规律。在此基础上,对堆载作用下邻近桩基的力学性状进行了分析,包括不同堆载大小、不同堆载距离和不同桩间距等情况下桩基的侧向变形和弯矩的变化规律。分析结果表明:随着堆载的增加,桩基的变形和弯矩都有显著的增长,桩基逐渐弯曲。在同样条件下,增加桩的刚度,桩身弯矩迅速减小,桩身刚度很大时,会发生整体侧移。桩间距和堆载距离对桩身弯矩和变形有重要影响,随着桩间距和堆载距离的增大,桩身的变形和弯矩都将减小。  相似文献   

6.
张磊  龚晓南  俞建霖 《岩土力学》2011,32(8):2441-2445
为提高桩身变形较大时纵横荷载单桩的设计计算水平,假定地基反力系数沿深度线性增加,考虑土体屈服及纵向荷载的P-?效应并计入桩身自重和桩侧摩阻力的影响,得到了地面以下桩身变形和内力的幂级数解。结合已有的地面以上桩身响应的幂级数解,采用Fortran语言编制了计算程序。计算结果表明:桩顶位移、地面处桩身位移及桩身最大弯矩均随纵横向荷载和自由段桩长的增加而增大,并随土体屈服位移的增加而减小;纵向荷载足够大时桩基失稳;桩顶约束条件对桩的响应影响很大。计算值与模型试验的实测值吻合较好,所得解和程序是可靠的。  相似文献   

7.
基于自制的冻土-桩动力相互作用模型试验系统,对-5℃、-3℃及上层融化多年冻土中模型桩基进行了水平向动力试验,主要研究了冻结及上层融化冻土中模型桩基的桩头位移-荷载关系、桩基水平动刚度变化及桩身弯矩分布情况。结果表明:冻土中桩基动力响应特性与土体温度密切相关;正冻土中桩基有较大的侧向刚度,当冻土与桩接触面出现较大间隙时,桩头位移-荷载曲线呈反S形;桩基动力性能随多年冻土温度降低将有所改善;当冻土上部出现融化层时,桩基动响应变化显著,桩头动刚度明显减小,桩基在较小动载下可发生较大侧向位移,同时桩身最大弯矩值较正冻土中偏大,且此弯矩点埋深较大。对于多年冻土区桩基工程,应特别重视夏季上层冻土融化时可能出现的震害。  相似文献   

8.
黄朝煊  袁文喜  胡国杰 《岩土力学》2021,(1):113-124,134
目前通过对软土地基预加固处理来提高桩基水平承载力已被工程界认可,但如何在工程前期设计过程中估算软土地基预处理后桩基水平承载力提高值仍是技术难点。基于此,参考Bowles[1]的地基土水平抗力计算式,同时考虑成层软土地基预排水固结处理影响,通过数学推导,推求出根据原状软土室内土工试验抗剪强度指标及预加固处理时间,估算软土地基预处理后桩基水平承载力提高值的实用计算方法。考虑桩侧土弹塑性屈服影响,推导出成层软土中水平受荷桩弹塑性解析解及塑性区深度的计算式,给出了桩顶水平位移、桩身最大弯矩的无量纲计算式及相关计算源代码。依托于浙江省某水闸桩基工程案例,根据提出的计算方法对桩基水平承载力、桩顶水平位移及桩身最大弯矩等性状进行预估计算,并与地基预处理前、后现场试桩检测值进行验证对比,认为桩基水平承载力、桩顶水平位移及桩身最大弯矩等预估计算成果与工程现场试桩的检测值较接近,对类似工程设计具有较好的参考价值。  相似文献   

9.
张治国  赵其华  徐晨  胡力绳 《岩土力学》2016,37(7):2011-2020
邻近建筑物进行基坑开挖会使桩基产生附加变形和内力,降低其承载能力,如果桩基变形过大会威胁到上部结构的安全。针对该领域目前存在的三维有限元数值模拟法建模复杂且计算耗时的现状,同时为了充分利用基坑围护位移较易通过现场监测技术获取的优势,提出了基于影像源法的基坑开挖引起邻近单桩变形影响的两阶段简化分析方法。同时,引入了Kerr地基模型,并针对Winkler地基模型进行改进,弥补了Winkler地基不能考虑土体连续性的缺陷。在第1阶段基于影像源法,由基坑围护变形计算基坑开挖引起的土体水平自由场位移;第2阶段分别基于Winkler和Kerr地基模型,将土体自由场位移施加于桩基,建立桩基在被动位移扰动下的微分控制方程,得到基坑开挖对邻近桩基影响的简化解析解,包括基坑开挖引起桩基的水平位移、弯矩和剪力等。将计算结果与既有理论结果、监测数据以及三维有限元数值模拟结果进行对比,取得了较好的一致性,其中基于Kerr地基模型的简化解比基于Winkler地基模型的简化解更为精确。该简化方法可为有效分析基坑开挖对邻近桩基的变形影响提供一定理论依据。  相似文献   

10.
轴向和横向荷载作用下单桩的受力变形分析是桩基研究的重点内容之一。单桩在水平荷载作用下会产生一定的水平位移与弯矩,而此时作用轴向荷载会使得桩体出现一定的压曲与附加弯矩,以致轴横向荷载作用下的单桩受力变形与单独作用水平荷载或轴向荷载的单桩存在较大的区别。故本文基于能量法,首先分别建立轴横向荷载作用下单桩的受力变形能量方程以及桩周土体能量方程,然后考虑桩土变形协调与一定的桩土相互作用,基于最小势能原理得到单桩变形控制微分方程,并采用幂级数法进行求解,最终得到轴横向荷载作用下单桩受力变形分析的幂级数解答。通过编程计算,将本文方法计算结果与试验结果、数值分析结果、规范法计算结果进行对比分析,验证了本文方法的合理性和可行性。在此基础上,基于本文解答进行了影响参数分析,结果表明:桩体长径比、桩土弹性模量比、桩周土模量深度变化系数均对轴横向受荷单桩的桩身水平位移与最大弯矩值有一定的影响,其中桩周土模量深度变化系数以不小于0.6为宜。  相似文献   

11.
为探明不同类型地震波作用下软弱土层差异厚度对单桩动力响应特性的影响,采用振动台试验,开展了不同软弱土层厚度变化下桩基础的加速度、水平位移、弯矩动力响应变化特性及桩基损伤分析。试验结果表明:地震波作用下,桩周土体的约束作用受软弱土层厚度的影响显著。桩身加速度在软弱土层中的放大效果最为显著,桩顶加速度放大系数与软弱土层厚度呈正相关;桩顶水平位移在软弱土层厚度最大时达到最大;桩身弯矩最大值出现在软弱土层中,随其厚度增大而增大。不同土层厚度下,桩身弯矩最大值均小于抗弯能力设计值,桩基完整性较好。桩基础抗震设计计算时,应重点加强桩基础在软弱土层中的抗震能力,并选择多种地震波进行抗震验算。  相似文献   

12.
An efficient analytical approach using the finite element (FE) method, is proposed to calculate the bending moment and deflection response of a single pile under the combined influence of lateral and axial compressive loading during an earthquake, in both saturated and dry homogenous soil, and in a typical layered soil. Applying a pseudo-static method, seismic loads are calculated using the maximum horizontal acceleration (MHA) obtained from a seismic ground response analysis and a lateral load coefficient (a) for both liquefying and non-liquefying soils. It is observed that for a pile having l/d ratio 40 and embedded in dry dense sand, the normalized moment and displacement increase when the input motion becomes more severe, as expected. Further increasing of a from 0.1 to 0.3 leads to increase in the normalized moment and displacement from 0.033 to 0.042, and 0.009 to 0.035, respectively. The validity of the proposed FE based solution for estimating seismic response of pile is also assessed through dynamic centrifuge test results.  相似文献   

13.
An analytical approach using the three‐dimensional displacement of a soil is investigated to provide analytical solutions of the horizontal response of a circular pile subjected to lateral soil movements in nonhomogeneous soil. The lateral stiffness coefficient of the pile shaft in nonhomogeneous soil is derived from the rocking stiffness coefficient that is obtained from the analytical solution, taking into account the three‐dimensional displacement represented in terms of scalar potentials in the elastic three‐dimensional analysis. The relationship between horizontal displacement, rotation, moment, and shear force of a pile subjected to lateral soil movements in nonhomogeneous soil is obtainable in the form of the recurrence equation. For the relationship between the lateral pressure and the horizontal displacement, it is assumed that the behavior is linear elastic up to lateral soil yield, and the lateral pressure is constant under the lateral soil yield. The interaction factors between piles subjected to both lateral load and moment are calculated, taking into account the lateral soil movement. The formulation of the lateral displacement and rotation of the pile base subjected to lateral loads in nonhomogeneous soils is presented by taking into account the Mindlin equation and the equivalent thickness for soil layers in the equivalent elastic method. For lateral movement, lateral pressure, bending moment, and interaction factors, there are small differences between results obtained from the 1‐D and the 3‐D displacement methods except a very flexible pile. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.  相似文献   

14.
轴向荷载对斜桩水平承载特性影响试验及理论研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
斜群桩受水平荷载作用时,群桩中的基桩受到径向荷载、轴向荷载和弯矩的共同作用。为研究轴向荷载对斜桩水平承载特性的影响,完成了3根单桩以及1组1×2斜桩的大尺寸模型试验。试验结果表明:轴向拉力作用会降低斜桩的水平刚度和极限承载力;而轴向压力作用则会使其水平刚度和极限承载力提高。基于桩侧浅层土体楔形破坏假定,推导了考虑轴向荷载影响的斜桩水平极限土抗力计算公式,提出了桩侧土抗力的p-y曲线方法,并通过模型试验及现场试验验证其合理性。  相似文献   

15.
In the present study an analytical procedure based on finite element technique is proposed to investigate the influence of vertical load on deflection and bending moment of a laterally loaded pile embedded in liquefiable soil, subjected to permanent ground displacement. The degradation of subgrade modulus due to soil liquefaction and effect of nonlinearity are also considered. A free headed vertical concrete elastic nonyielding pile with a floating tip subjected to vertical compressive loading, lateral load, and permanent ground displacement due to earthquake motions, in liquefiable soil underlain by nonliquefiable stratum, is considered. The input seismic motions, having varying range of ground motion parameters, considered here include 1989 Loma Gilroy, 1995 Kobe, 2001 Bhuj, and 2011 Sikkim motions. It is calculated that maximum bending moment occurred at the interface of liquefiable and nonliquefiable soil layers and when thickness of liquefiable soil layer is around 60% of total pile length. Maximum bending moment of 1210 kNm and pile head deflection of 110 cm is observed because of 1995 Kobe motion, while 2001 Bhuj and 2011 Sikkim motions amplify the pile head deflection by 14.2 and 14.4 times and bending moment approximately by 4 times, when compared to nonliquefiable soil. Further, the presence of inertial load at the pile head increases bending moment and deflection by approximately 52% when subjected to 1995 Kobe motion. Thus, it is necessary to have a proper assessment of both kinematic and inertial interactions due to free field seismic motions and vertical loads for evaluating pile response in liquefiable soil.  相似文献   

16.
This article revisits the influences of axial load on the lateral response of single pile with integral equation method. The problem is formulated by decomposing the pile soil system into an extended elastic soil and a fictitious pile, the former of which is analyzed by making use of the fundamental Mindlin's solution for a concentrated horizontal load whereas the latter is modeled by the conventional beam bending theory. According to the rotation compatibility condition between the fictitious pile and the extended soil, a Fredholm integral equation of the second kind is established with the shear strain and rotation angle of the fictitious pile being the basic unknowns. The bending moment and displacement distribution along the pile are subsequently obtained. Comparison with existing solutions validates the accuracy and applicability of the present formulation. The results of parametric analysis indicate that the influences of axial load on the lateral response of single piles could be significant, and in general, the bending moment and horizontal displacement distributions along the pile increase considerably with the increase of axial load. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.  相似文献   

17.
黄银冰  赵恒博  顾长存  邵杰 《岩土力学》2013,34(4):1109-1115
结合淤泥土地基中的三洋港挡潮闸工程,研究水泥土桩增强灌注桩水平承载特性的效果,在现场进行水平静载荷试验。试验时,为量测钢筋应力,在钻孔形成灌注桩时将钢筋计焊接在钢筋笼的不同高程,测得在施加水平荷载时桩身的应力分布情况,从而得到弯矩的分布;将土压力盒埋入桩侧土体中,测试在水平荷载下桩周土体的土压力分布规律。试验结果表明,打设水泥土桩能够控制灌注桩水平位移的发展,并能提高灌注桩水平承载能力;灌注桩桩身弯矩值和桩周土体的土压力的分布情况都呈现先增加后减小的变化规律,并且都主要集中在上部桩体和土体中,其最大值约为泥面以下3 m左右的位置;水泥土桩的打设能够有效地减小桩身弯矩值,并且可以减弱底部反弯矩的出现;打设有水泥土桩的灌注桩桩周土体能够提供更大的土压力。另外,灌注桩的水平承载力受上部土体的影响较大,即提高上部土体的物理力学性质可以有效增大灌注桩水平承载力。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号