共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 767 毫秒
1.
To ensure the consistent use of the current GPS precise satellite clock products, the inter-frequency clock bias (IFCB) should be carefully considered for triple-frequency precise point positioning (PPP). It is beneficial to investigate the modeling of the IFCB for multi-frequency PPP, especially for real-time users suffering from difficulties in real-time IFCB estimations. Our analysis is based on datasets from 129 stations spanning a whole year. A harmonic analysis is performed for all single-day IFCB time series, and periodic IFCB variations with periods of 12, 8, 6, 4.8, 4 and 3 h are identified. An empirical model composed of a sixth-order harmonic function and a linear function is presented to describe daily variations in the IFCB, and the modeling accuracy is 4 mm. A least squares fit is adopted to estimate the single-day harmonic coefficients phase and amplitude. The prediction accuracy of the IFCB models degrades from 7.2 to 12.3 mm when the time span of prediction is increased from a day to a week. When using IFCB models of the previous day to obtain the IFCB correction values, the positioning accuracy of triple-frequency PPP is improved by 21, 11 and 16% over the triple-frequency PPP neglecting the IFCB in the post-processing mode in the east, north and up directions, respectively. As to the real-time triple-frequency PPP, the corresponding accuracy improvement is 24, 9 and 10% in the three directions, respectively. 相似文献
2.
在精细考虑伪距和载波相位硬件偏差时变特性的基础上,导出了更为严谨的非差非组合观测方程,并给出了非组合模式下两类GNSS偏差的数学表达形式。基于此,本文详细研究了3种常用的三频精密单点定位(PPP),即无电离层两两组合IF1213、单个无电离层组合IF123与非组合UC123函数模型的独立参数化方法,系统分析了3种PPP模型的相互关系以及GPS/BDS/Galileo三频静、动态PPP定位性能。结果表明,静态PPP收敛后定位精度水平方向优于1.0 cm,高程优于1.5 cm;动态PPP水平方向优于2.0 cm,高程优于5.0 cm;三频PPP的定位性能与双频PPP基本相当。 相似文献
3.
The current satellite clock products are computed using the ionosphere-free phase (L1/L2) and code (P1/P2) observations. Thus, if users conduct undifferenced positioning using these clock products together with C1 and P2 observations, the differential code bias (DCB) (C1–P1) should be properly compensated. The influence of DCB (C1–P1) on the undifferenced ambiguity solutions is investigated. Based on the investigation, we propose a new DCB (C1–P1) estimation method. Using it, the satellite DCB (C1–P1) can be computed. A 30-day (DOY 205–234, 2012) dual-frequency GPS data set is processed to estimate the DCB (C1–P1). Comparing the estimated results with that of IGS DCB products, the accuracy is better than 0.13 m. The performances of DCB (C1–P1) in the code-based single-point positioning, precise point positioning (PPP) convergence and wide-lane uncalibrated phase delay (UPD) estimation are investigated using the estimated DCB (C1–P1). The results of the code-based single-point positioning show that the influence of DCB (C1–P1) on the up direction is more evident than on the horizontal directions. The accuracy is improved by 50 % and reaches to decimeter level with DCB (C1–P1) application. The performance of DCB (C1–P1) in PPP shows that it can accelerate PPP convergence through improving the accuracy of the code observation. The computed UPD values show that influence of DCB (C1–P1) on UPD of each satellite is different, and some values are larger than 0.3 cycles. 相似文献
4.
GPS satellite clock determination in case of inter-frequency clock biases for triple-frequency precise point positioning 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Significant time-varying inter-frequency clock biases (IFCBs) within GPS observations prevent the application of the legacy L1/L2 ionosphere-free clock products on L5 signals. Conventional approaches overcoming this problem are to estimate L1/L5 ionosphere-free clocks in addition to their L1/L2 counterparts or to compute IFCBs between the L1/L2 and L1/L5 clocks which are later modeled through a harmonic analysis. In contrast, we start from the undifferenced uncombined GNSS model and propose an alternative approach where a second satellite clock parameter dedicated to the L5 signals is estimated along with the legacy L1/L2 clock. In this manner, we do not need to rely on the correlated L1/L2 and L1/L5 ionosphere-free observables which complicates triple-frequency GPS stochastic models, or account for the unfavorable time-varying hardware biases in undifferenced GPS functional models since they can be absorbed by the L5 clocks. An extra advantage over the ionosphere-free model is that external ionosphere constraints can potentially be introduced to improve PPP. With 27 days of triple-frequency GPS data from globally distributed stations, we find that the RMS of the positioning differences between our GPS model and all conventional models is below 1 mm for all east, north and up components, demonstrating the effectiveness of our model in addressing triple-frequency observations and time-varying IFCBs. Moreover, we can combine the L1/L2 and L5 clocks derived from our model to calculate precisely the L1/L5 clocks which in practice only depart from their legacy counterparts by less than 0.006 ns in RMS. Our triple-frequency GPS model proves convenient and efficient in combating time-varying IFCBs and can be generalized to more than three frequency signals for satellite clock determination. 相似文献
5.
在传统多系统非差非组合精密单点定位（precise point positioning，PPP）模型中，电离层延迟会吸收部分接收机码硬件延迟，其估计值可能为负数。提出了一种估计接收机差分码偏差（differential code bias，DCB）参数的GPS（Global Positioning System）/BDS（BeiDou Navigation Satellite System）非组合PPP模型，将每个系统第1个频率上的接收机码硬件延迟约束为零，对接收机DCB进行参数估计，达到了分离电离层延迟和接收机码硬件延迟的目的，降低了接收机钟差和电离层延迟的相关程度。利用4个多星座实验（multi-GNSS experiment，MGEX）跟踪站的GPS/BDS数据进行了静态和动态PPP试验，结果表明，与不估计DCB参数的PPP模型相比，采用估计DCB参数PPP模型后，静态模式下定位精度和收敛速度平均提高了29.3%和29.8%，动态模式下定位精度和收敛速度平均提高了15.7%和21.6%。 相似文献
6.
This study provides a systemic analysis to identify the biases in estimated satellite clocks and illustrates their effects in precise point positioning (PPP). First, the precise satellite clock estimation method considering pseudorange and carrier phase hardware delays is derived. Two methods for satellite clock estimation are compared, and their equivalency is discussed. The results show that apart from the well-known constant code hardware biases, the time-variant phase hardware biases are also absorbed by the estimated clocks. Also, the satellite clocks contain biases caused by modeling errors. To analyze the effects of these biases, they are grouped into initial clock biases (ICBs) and time-dependent biases (TDBs). Then, a detailed analysis of the impact of the biases on PPP-based troposphere and coordinate estimates is conducted. The experimental analysis demonstrates that TDBs affect positioning and tropospheric estimates, and their impacts are more significant in the static mode. The ICBs affect coordinate accuracy, zenith total delay mean bias, and its standard deviations only at the millimeter level for kinematic and static PPP, which is negligible. However, the ICBs affect the convergence period for both static and real kinematic PPP, and the magnitude of their impact largely depends on data quality. Note that satellites clocks are generally estimated with the P1/P2 and L1/L2 ionospheric-free combinations, and that hardware-specific parts of ICBs and TDBs cancel if users employ the same type of observables as the clock providers. Otherwise, the effects of biases cannot be ignored, especially for triple-frequency applications. Also, modeling-specific parts of ICBs and TDBs are significant in real-time clocks, which also affect user applications. Our conclusion is applicable for understanding the effects of these biases. 相似文献
7.
Improved method for estimating the inter-frequency satellite clock bias of triple-frequency GPS 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Considering the contribution of the hardware biases to the estimated clock errors, an improved method for estimating the satellite inter-frequency clock bias (IFCB) is presented, i.e., the difference in the satellite clock error as computed from ionospheric-free pseudorange and carrier phase observations using L1/L2 and P1/P2 versus L1/L5 and P1/P5. The IFCB is composed of a constant and a variable part. The constant part is the inter-frequency hardware bias (IFHB). It contains the satellite and receiver hardware delays and can be expressed as a function of the DCBs [DCB (P1 ? P2) and DCB (P1 ? P5)]. When a reference satellite is selected, the satellite IFHB can be computed but is biased by a reference satellite IFHB. This bias will not affect the utilization of IFCB in positioning since it can be absorbed by the receiver clock error. Triple-frequency observations of 30 IGS stations between June 1, 2013, and May 31, 2014, were processed to show the variations of the IFHB. The IFHB values show a long-term variation with time. When a linear and a fourth-order harmonic function are used to model the estimated IFCB, which contains contributions of the hardware delays and clock errors, the results show that 89 % of the IFCB can be corrected given the current five triple-frequency GPS satellites with the averaged fitting RMS of 1.35 cm. Five days of data are processed to test the estimated satellite clock errors using the strategy presented. The residuals of P1/P5 and L1/L5 have a STD of <0.27 m and 0.97 cm, respectively. In addition, most predicted satellite IFCBs reach an accuracy of centimeter level and its mean accuracy of 5 days is better than 7 cm. 相似文献
8.
卫星频间钟差偏差（Inter-Frequency Clock Bias, IFCB）变化特性的分析对其模型化、卫星钟稳定性的评估具有重要的意义。采用北斗(COMPASS) 2012年1月的三频数据,解算了GEO卫星的IFCB并分析了其时序特性。为了削弱粗差对解算结果的影响,采用了抗差估计算法。针对GEO卫星IFCB的特性,提出了GEO卫星IFCB的经验模型。结果表明,二次曲线函数能较好的描述GEO卫星的IFCB,并达到71%以上的改正效果。 相似文献
9.
在三频GNSS应用中,受精密产品频率基准不一致的影响,会引入系统性偏差,即频间时钟偏差（IFCB）。本文首先通过对IFGF组合观测值进行历元差分,利用全球分布的80个MGEX观测站及中国区域内100个连续运行参考站,在2021年年积日（DOY）153—160 d的实测数据,进行了IFCB的估计并分析了其时变特性;然后将IFCB的估计结果运用到非差非组合PPP中。结果表明：GPS BLOCK Ⅱ-F的IFCB较大,幅值可达14 cm,GPS BLOCK Ⅲ与BDS的IFCB则较小,一般不超过5 cm。在定位验证中,经过IFCB改正后,GPS/BDS-2/BDS-3-IGSO在第3频点L5、B2I、B2a的相位残差分别减小了59.54%、26.31%、10.98%。其中,动态定位的GPS、BDS-2/BDS-3-IGSO、GPS/BDS-2/BDS-3-IGSO 3种方案的点位精度分别提升了56.55%、29.16%、20.72%,改善效果显著。 相似文献
10.
北斗三号卫星导航系统（BeiDou-3 navigation satellite system,BDS-3）全球组网工作全面建成,标志着BDS-3迈入全球定位、导航和授时服务的新时代。为了全面比较BDS-3系统与其余全球导航卫星系统（global navigation satellite system,GNSS）非组合精密单点定位（precise point positioning,PPP）性能,重点分析不同分析中心BDS-3精密轨道和钟差产品的一致性、BDS-3/GNSS卫星可用性、BDS-3/GNSS单系统及多系统融合PPP定位性能。结果表明,基于5个分析中心的精密轨道和钟差产品,BDS-3静态PPP三维均方根误差约为2.31~4.00 cm,其单系统收敛时间明显慢于其余GNSS系统,GPS系统的加入对BDS-3/GNSS双系统融合PPP改善效果最为明显,且四系统融合能够有效地缩短收敛时间,并提高动态PPP定位精度。随着BDS-3系统的发展以及轨道和钟差产品的进一步完善,BDS-3同样具备其余GNSS系统提供优质导航定位服务的潜力。 相似文献
11.
差分码偏差（differential code bias,DCB）是影响电离层监测和导航定位精度的重要因素之一,建立DCB改正模型对高精度定位有重要意义。针对北斗三号卫星的广播星历和精密星历钟差参数时间基准不统一的问题,首先介绍了多星座实验（multi-GNSS experiment,MGEX）发布的DCB产品的估计方法,给出了部分DCB产品的精度评估和分析结果;然后提出了北斗三号卫星单频和双频伪距单点定位以及双频精密单点定位的DCB改正模型;最后利用5个MGEX测站连续5 d的实测数据分别进行了DCB改正前后的定位实验。结果表明,MGEX发布的DCB产品均具有较高的稳定性,经卫星DCB改正后,单频和双频伪距单点定位的定位精度分别提高了48%~85%和71%~91%,双频静态精密单点定位的收敛时间减少了56%~83%。 相似文献
12.
BDS/GPS精密单点定位收敛时间与定位精度的比较 总被引：5，自引：1，他引：4
采用武汉大学卫星导航定位技术研究中心发布的北斗精密卫星轨道和钟差,在TriP 2.0软件的基础上实现了BDS PPP定位算法,并利用大量实测数据进行了BDS/GPS静态PPP和动态PPP浮点解试验。结果表明,BDS静态PPP的收敛时间约为80min,动态PPP的收敛时间为100min;对于3h的观测数据,静态PPP收敛后定位精度优于5cm,动态PPP收敛后水平方向优于8cm,高程方向约12cm;与GPS PPP类似,东分量上定位精度较北分量稍差。当前由于BDS的全球跟踪站有限,精密轨道和钟差精度不如GPS,因此BDS PPP的收敛时间较GPS长,但收敛后可实现厘米至分米级的绝对定位。 相似文献
13.
Three-frequency BDS precise point positioning ambiguity resolution based on raw observables 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
All BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) satellites are transmitting signals on three frequencies, which brings new opportunity and challenges for high-accuracy precise point positioning (PPP) with ambiguity resolution (AR). This paper proposes an effective uncalibrated phase delay (UPD) estimation and AR strategy which is based on a raw PPP model. First, triple-frequency raw PPP models are developed. The observation model and stochastic model are designed and extended to accommodate the third frequency. Then, the UPD is parameterized in raw frequency form while estimating with the high-precision and low-noise integer linear combination of float ambiguity which are derived by ambiguity decorrelation. Third, with UPD corrected, the LAMBDA method is used for resolving full or partial ambiguities which can be fixed. This method can be easily and flexibly extended for dual-, triple- or even more frequency. To verify the effectiveness and performance of triple-frequency PPP AR, tests with real BDS data from 90 stations lasting for 21 days were performed in static mode. Data were processed with three strategies: BDS triple-frequency ambiguity-float PPP, BDS triple-frequency PPP with dual-frequency (B1/B2) and three-frequency AR, respectively. Numerous experiment results showed that compared with the ambiguity-float solution, the performance in terms of convergence time and positioning biases can be significantly improved by AR. Among three groups of solutions, the triple-frequency PPP AR achieved the best performance. Compared with dual-frequency AR, additional the third frequency could apparently improve the position estimations during the initialization phase and under constraint environments when the dual-frequency PPP AR is limited by few satellite numbers. 相似文献
14.
15.
PPP/PPP-RTK新进展与北斗/GNSS PPP定位性能比较 总被引：9，自引：7，他引：9
首先简要回顾了精密单点定位（PPP）技术在最近几年的发展现状,重点总结了高采样率钟差实时快速估计、多系统组合PPP模糊度固定、多频GNSS PPP模型及其模糊度固定、PPP快速初始化、PPP-RTK等若干热点方向的最新研究进展。在此基础上,利用目前四大卫星导航系统（GPS、GLONASS、Galileo、北斗）最新的实际观测数据,全面比较分析了各系统及多系统组合PPP定位性能,重点给出了北斗二号+北斗三号PPP浮点解和固定解的定位精度、收敛时间和首次固定时间。结果表明：我国北斗导航卫星系统已经可以实现与其他导航卫星系统基本相当的PPP定位性能。北斗二号+北斗三号组合PPP的收敛时间/首次固定时间20~30 min;静态解的东、北、天方向定位精度在毫米到厘米级;动态解水平方向约5 cm,高程方向约7 cm;多系统组合可显著提高PPP定位精度、收敛时间和首次固定时间：固定解定位精度比浮点解在东、北、天方向分别提升了14.8%、12.0%和12.8%;相比单GPS,多系统组合PPP浮点解的收敛时间和固定解首次固定时间分别缩短了36.5%和40.4%。 相似文献
16.
3种GPS+BDS组合PPP模型比较与分析 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
无电离层组合和非组合模型是GNSS精密单点定位(PPP)常用的两种函数模型。本文通过详细分析PPP的两种函数模型各类参数间的相关特性,建立了参数独立的函数模型。对非组合PPP模型的电离层参数引入虚拟观测方程进行约束,有效提高了PPP的收敛速度。最后,从定位精度和收敛时间两方面分析不同函数模型的GPS单系统和GPS+BDS组合PPP静态、模拟动态定位效果。结果表明:GPS单系统和GPS+BDS组合PPP定位精度相当,静态的无电离层组合与非组合PPP均可达到厘米至毫米级精度,动态PPP精度的平面优于3cm,高程优于5cm;无电离层组合PPP收敛时间优于非组合的PPP,电离层加权非组合PPP的收敛时间最短。动态定位中,电离层加权模型相比于无电离层组合模型,可减少约15%的收敛时间,相比于非组合模型,可减少约34%。 相似文献
17.
Analyzing GNSS data in precise point positioning software 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
This work demonstrates that precise point positioning (PPP) can be used not only for positioning, but for a variety of other
tasks, such as signal analysis. The fact that the observation model used for accurate error modeling has to take into consideration
the several effects present in GPS signals, and that observations are undifferenced, makes PPP a powerful data analysis tool
sensitive to a variety of parameters. The PPP application developed at the University of New Brunswick, which is called GAPS
(GPS Analysis and Positioning Software), has been designed and built in order to take advantage of available precise products,
resulting in a data analysis tool for determining parameters in addition to position, receiver clock error, and neutral atmosphere
delay. These other estimated parameters include ionospheric delays, code biases, satellite clock errors, and code multipath
among others. In all cases, the procedures were developed in order to be suitable for real-time as well as post-processing
applications. One of the main accomplishments in the development described here is the use of very precise satellite products,
coupled with a very complete observation error modeling to make possible a variety of analyses based on GPS data. In this
paper, several procedures are described, their innovative aspects are pointed out, and their results are analyzed and compared
with other sources. The procedures and software are readily adaptable for using data from other global navigation satellite
systems. 相似文献
18.
在Trip软件的基础上实现了北斗三频无电离层两两组合、三频消电离层组合和三频非组合精密单点定位（precise point positioning,PPP）算法。利用12个陆态网观测站的北斗三频观测数据对3种三频PPP定位模型及传统的双频无电离层组合PPP模型的定位性能进行分析。试验结果表明,对大多数测站,3种三频PPP模型静态定位精度水平方向优于1 cm,高程方向优于2 cm,动态定位精度水平方向优于4 cm,高程方向优于6 cm;3种三频PPP模型静态收敛时间约为120 min,动态收敛时间约180 min;相比于传统的双频PPP模型,三频PPP模型的定位精度有所提高,其中,三频非组合模型静态单天解RMS在水平方向和高程方向分别提高36.1%和6.3%,动态单天解RMS在水平方向和高程方向分别提高9.1%和6.3%。 相似文献
19.
We present the new MAP3 algorithms to perform static precise point positioning (PPP) from multifrequency and multisystem GNSS observations. MAP3 represents a two-step strategy in which the least squares theory is applied twice to estimate smoothed pseudo-distances, initial phase ambiguities, and slant ionospheric delay first, and the absolute receiver position and its clock offset in a second adjustment. Unlike the classic PPP technique, in our new approach, the ionospheric-free linear combination is not used. The combination of signals from different satellite systems is accomplished by taking into account the receiver inter-system bias. MAP3 has been implemented in MATLAB and integrated within a complete PPP software developed on site and named PCube. We test the MAP3 performance numerically and contrast it with other external PPP programs. In general, MAP3 positioning accuracy with low-noise GPS dual-frequency observations is about 2.5 cm in 2-h observation periods, 1 cm in 10 h, and 7 mm after 1 day. This means an improvement in the accuracy in short observation periods of at least 7 mm with respect to the other PPP programs. The MAP3 convergence time is also analyzed and some results obtained from real triple-frequency GPS and GIOVE observations are presented. 相似文献
20.
在进行GPS/GLONASS联合卫星钟差估计时,GLONASS码频间偏差（inter-frequency bias,IFB）因卫星频率间的差异而无法被测站接收机钟差参数吸收,其一部分将进入GLONASS卫星钟差估值中。通过引入多个"时频偏差"参数（inter-system and inter-frequency bias,ISFB）及附加基准约束对测站GLONASS码IFB进行函数模型补偿,实现其与待估卫星钟差参数的有效分离,并对所估计实时卫星钟差和实时精度单点定位（real-time precise point positioning,RT-PPP）进行精度评估。结果表明,在卫星钟差估计观测方程中忽略码IFB,会明显降低GLONASS卫星钟差估值精度;新方法能有效避免码IFB对卫星钟差估值的影响,所获得GPS、GLONASS卫星钟差与ESA（European Space Agency）事后精密钟差产品偏差平均均方根值分别小于0.2 ns、0.3 ns。利用实时估计卫星钟差进行静态RT-PPP,当观测时段长为2 h时,GPS单系统、GPS/GLONASS组合系统的3D定位精度优于10 cm,GLONASS单系统3D定位精度约为15 cm;三种模式24 h单天解的3D定位精度均优于5 cm。 相似文献