排序方式： 共有15条查询结果，搜索用时 554 毫秒
1.
A Step Towards Evaluation of the Seismic Response Reduction Factor in Multistorey Reinforced Concrete Frames 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
A seismic nonlinear time-history analysis was made for four-, six-, and eight-storey reinforced concrete buildings. These buildings were made as three-dimensional space frame structures with shear walls in both orthogonal directions. They have five bays with 4.8 m spacing each in the horizontal direction, and three bays with 4.2 m spacing each in the transversal direction. The frames were designed according to the Jordanian Seismic Code of practice for Seismic Zones 4, 3, 2, and 1 as proposed for Jordan by several authors. Time-history analysis was made using the El Centro (N-S) earthquake record of May 1940 as an actual earthquake excitation. The response reduction factor (R) that primarily consists of two factors that are the ductility reduction (Rµ) and the overstrength (), is obtained. It has been seen that the seismic zoning has a slight effect on the ductility reduction factor for different buildings, since it ranges from Zone 4 to Zone 1 as 2.37 to 2.52, 1.72 to 1.78, and 1.14 to 1.18 for four-, six-, and eight-storey buildings, respectively. Moreover, it is observed that, for different buildings and different seismic zones, the ductility reduction factor (Rµ) is slightly different from the system ductility factor (µ) especially for higher values of µ (i.e., Rµ µ). The response reduction factor, called overstrength (), was evaluated. The overstrength factor was found to vary with seismic zones (Z) , number of stories, and design gravity loads. However, the dependency on seismic zones was the strongest. The average overstrength of these buildings in Zones 4 and 1 was 2.61 and 6.94, respectively. The overstrength increased as the number of storeys decreased: overstrength of a four-storey building was higher than an eight-storey building by 36% in Zone 4, and 39% in Zone 1. Furthermore, buildings of the three heights had an average overstrength 165.9% higher in Zone 1 than in Zone 4. These observations have a significant implications for the seismic design codes which currently do not take into account the variation of the response reduction factor, R (i.e., ductility reduction factor times overstrength). 相似文献
2.
3.
Effect of gravity framing on the overstrength and collapse capacity of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 This paper investigates the effect of the gravity framing system on the overstrength and collapse risk of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames (SMFs) designed in North America. A nonlinear analytical model that simulates the pinched hysteretic response of typical shear tab connections is calibrated with past experimental data. The proposed modeling approach is implemented into nonlinear analytical models of archetype steel buildings with different heights. It is found that when the gravity framing is considered as part of the analytical model, the overall base shear strength of steel frame buildings with perimeter SMFs could be 50% larger than that of the bare SMFs. This is attributed to the gravity framing as well as the composite action provided by the concrete slab. The same analytical models (i) achieve a static overstrength factor, Ωs larger than 3.0 and (ii) pass the collapse risk evaluation criteria by FEMA P695 regardless of the assigned total system uncertainty. However, when more precise collapse metrics are considered for collapse risk assessment of steel frame buildings with perimeter SMFs, a tolerable probability of collapse is only achieved in a return period of 50 years when the perimeter SMFs of mid‐rise steel buildings are designed with a strong‐column/weak‐beam ratio larger than 1.5. The concept of the dynamic overstrength, Ωd is introduced that captures the inelastic force redistribution due to dynamic loading. Steel frame buildings with perimeter SMFs achieve a Ωd > 3 regardless if the gravity framing is considered as part of the nonlinear analytical model representation. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
4.
Hemchandra Chaulagain Hugo Rodrigues Enrico Spacone Ramesh Guragain Radhakrishna Mallik Humberto Varum 《地震工程与工程振动(英文版)》2014,13(3):455-470
Most current seismic design includes the nonlinear response of a structure through a response reduction factor(R). This allows the designer to use a linear elastic force-based approach while accounting for nonlinear behavior and deformation limits. In fact, the response reduction factor is used in modern seismic codes to scale down the elastic response of a structure. This study focuses on estimating the actual ‘R' value for engineered design/construction of reinforced concrete(RC) buildings in Kathmandu valley. The ductility and overstrength of representative RC buildings in Kathmandu are investigated. Nonlinear pushover analysis was performed on structural models in order to evaluate the seismic performance of buildings. Twelve representative engineered irregular buildings with a variety of characteristics located in the Kathmandu valley were selected and studied. Furthermore, the effects of overstrength on the ductility factor, beam column capacity ratio on the building ductility, and load path on the response reduction factor, are examined. Finally, the results are further analyzed and compared with different structural parameters of the buildings. 相似文献
5.
Mario de Stefano Edoardo Michele Marino Pier Paolo Rossi 《Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering》2006,4(1):23-42
In past years, seismic response of asymmetric structures has been frequently analysed by means of single-storey models, because
of their simplicity and low computational cost. However, it is widely believed that use of more realistic multi-storey models
is needed in order to investigate effects of some system characteristics (such as overstrength, higher modes of vibration,
etc.) that make behaviour of multi-storey schemes different from that of single-storey systems. This paper examines effects
of the overstrength in element cross-sections on the seismic behaviour of multi-storey asymmetric buildings. It is shown that
in actual buildings this characteristic, which is sometimes very variable both in plan and along the height of the building,
may lead to distributions of ductility demands different from those expected according to the results from single-storey models.
Consequently, torsional provisions, which aim at reducing ductility demands of single-storey asymmetric systems to those of
the corresponding torsionally balanced systems, should be re-checked in light of the behaviour of realistic multi-storey buildings. 相似文献
6.
为研究评估方法对量化半刚接钢框架内填暗竖缝RC墙结构(简称PSRCW)超强性能的影响,严格按我国现行抗震规范设计了一栋位于设防烈度为8度区的10层PSRCW标准算例。考虑钢材、钢筋、混凝土强度等材料力学性能的随机性,基于Latin超立方抽样方法将其扩展为40个PSRCW样本算例,采用广义乘方及均匀水平荷载分布模式的循环Pushover方法确定了40个PSRCW样本算例的滞回及骨架曲线,基于概率方法按置信水平为95%的单侧置信下限值确定PSRCW结构的超强系数。随后,选取ATC63规范建议的2组22条近场及远场地震波,对10层PSRCW标准算例进行增量动力时程分析(简称IDA),基于概率法确定了10层PSRCW标准算例的超强系数。分析结果表明:评估方法对量化PSRCW结构超强系数影响显著,考虑材料随机性按广义乘方分布循环Pushover方法确定10层PSRCW标准算例的超强系数为1.3,按均匀分布循环Pushover方法确定的10层PSRCW标准算例的超强系数为1.73。考虑近场及远场地震波随机性按IDA方法确定10层PSRCW标准算例的超强系数分别为2.45和2.42。 相似文献
7.
Vulnerability of reinforced concrete frames in low seismic region,when designed according to BS 8110
The overstrength and ductility due to redistribution of internal forces are being investigated for three bay multi-storey reinforced concrete plane frames, using non-linear push-over analysis. These frames are designed to resist gravity loads, wind loads and a notional horizontal load in accordance with the British code BS 8110, which does not have any special provision for seismic loads. The results show that the overstrength factors for the three-, six- and ten-storey frames are respectively, 7·5, 5·6 and 2·2 times the design lateral loads, whereas, the ductility factors for the three frames are similar, and slightly greater than 2. These values yield a response modification factor of 18·0, 12·2 and 4·7 for the three-, six- and ten-storey frames, respectively. The effect of infill walls on the response modification factor is also being investigated, and a suitable response modification factor for assessing the vulnerability of reinforced concrete frames of about 10 storeys high is recommended. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
8.
基于现行的中国抗震设计规范,设计了6个不同参数的钢筋混凝土框架结构模型,利用静力弹塑性（Pushover）分析方法求得各个框架结构的超强系数;同时,利用基于性能的抗震设计（PBSD）的方法,通过增量动力分析（IDA）、易损性分析和地震损失风险分析等,定量的求出各个框架结构的经济损失风险,并比较了不同框架结构超强系数和经济损失风险的变化情况。结果表明:在层高相同的情况下,当抗震设防烈度逐渐增大时,超强系数减小,经济损失风险逐渐增大;在抗震设防烈度相同的情况下,当层高增大时,超强系数减小,经济损失风险逐渐增大。 相似文献
9.
The aim of this paper is to investigate the plastic rotation capacity of composite beams as well as the overstrength factors for composite joints considering the actual European steel production. It relies on the statistical data of the mechanical properties of steel profiles and reinforcement bars produced in several European steel mills that have been collected during the European research project OPUS. Several steel and composite structures have been designed following the EN 1998 rules, and the effect of the statistical distribution of the steel properties on the design has been analyzed. In such structures, the first attainment of the rotation capacity is expected to happen in the hogging region. The plastic rotation capacity was evaluated using the so‐called standard beam concept. The moment–rotation curve was constructed by joining together the pre‐buckling branch, determined using a fiber model, and the post‐buckling part derived by considering the local plastic failure mechanism as suggested by Gioncu. A program in MATLAB (MATLAB version 7.10.0. Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc., 2010) was developed to establish such curve for arbitrary composite beams. The predictions of the model compare favorably against the experimental results. On the basis of the probabilistic model for the mechanical properties of steel, we derive the statistical distribution of the maximum rotation defined at the intersection of the pre‐buckling and post‐buckling curves. Next, we estimate the so‐called overstrength factors. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
10.
本文将基于能力的设计原理引入转换层结构设计,提出了“强转换弱上部”思想,给出了转换构件的能力设计公式。考虑了转换结构刚度和质量变化以及抗震设防烈度和转换层设置高度的不同对转换结构所受罕遇地震作用的影响,从工程应用的角度给出适用各类转换形式的能力设计简化公式,给出转换层结构能力设计的具体步骤。通过工程算例,对运用能力设计方法、我国现行规范方法以及在工程界应用的水平地震作用增大系数法(G βE)进行对比,并对转换层结构的能力设计方法应用提出了建议。 相似文献