共查询到16条相似文献，搜索用时 390 毫秒
1.
ASTER GDEM V2是研究南极冰盖表面的一种重要DEM数据源。由于南极冰雪区反射率高且缺乏地形特征，导致ASTER GDEM V2存在大量的坑、隆起等噪声，难以直接用于南极地形分析。本文以ICESat/GLAS激光点高程数据作为参考，采用修正等高线法对南极伯德（Byrd）冰川ASTER GDEM V2进行了误差校正，并将其与ICESat-1 DEM的垂直精度进行了对比分析。结果表明：ASTER GDEM V2的RMSE由校正前的26.56 m下降到校正后的18.77 m，远低于ICESat-1 DEM的RMSE（121.24 m）；校正后的ASTER GDEM V2高程精度受坡度影响较小，不存在明显的系统误差，而ICESat-1 DEM的高程精度受坡度的影响较大。本研究进一步通过地形剖面分析得到：校正前的ASTER GDEM V2噪声主要分布于高程较低、地形平坦的区域，通过修正等高线的方法可以有效去除这些噪声，去除噪声后的ASTER GDEM V2可作为研究伯德冰川理想的DEM数据源。 相似文献
2.
ASTER GDEM与SRTM3高程差异影响因素分析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
作为最新发布的全球地形数据,ASTER GDEM比目前常用的SRTM3数据有着更高的分辨率和更广的覆盖范围,对于相关地学分析具有重要意义。本文以华中地区为研究区域,对ASTER GDEM与SRTM3数据进行了比较,重点分析了坡度、坡向、地形起伏度、土地利用类型、植被覆盖度、生成ASTER GDEM栅格点高程数据所用的ASTER DEM影像数等因素对2种DEM数据高程差异的影响。结果表明,在研究区域内,ASTER GDEM高程比SRTM3高程平均低5.42 m,两种DEM数据高程差异的RMS值为16.90 m;ASTER GDEM与SRTM3之间的高程差异随着坡度、地形起伏度、植被覆盖度的增大而增大,而ASTER DEM影像数越大,高程差异越小;坡向、土地利用类型对高程差异也有影响。 相似文献
3.
由于数据获取与后期处理方式不同,先进星载热发射和反射辐射仪全球数字高程模型(advanced spaceborne thermalemissionandreflectionradiometerglobaldigitalelevationmodel,ASTERGDEM)和航天飞机雷达地形测绘任务(shuttle radar topography mission,SRTM)数据在高程精度上存在差异,采用弹性反馈（resilient backpropagation,RProp）神经网络算法对二者进行融合处理,实现优势互补以提升高程精度。选取两个黄土丘陵沟壑地貌样区分别用于模型建立与效果验证,1∶10 000高程精度为参考数据,在建模样区应用RProp神经网络算法构建ASTER GDEM高程校正模型、SRTM1高程校正模型、ASTER GDEM与SRTM1高程融合模型,同时应用误差反向传播(back propagation,BP)神经网络建立ASTER GDEM与SRTM1高程融合模型,将这些模型的高程精度优化效果进行对比,并在验证样区检验RProp融合模型的可行性。结果表明,RProp融合模... 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
为了解我国ASTER GDEM数据高程精度,在考虑空间分布的情况下,选取我国东部辽宁、山东、浙江和海南4个地区的平原、丘陵、山地等作为典型研究区,并以1∶5万DEM为假定真值、以1∶25万DEM为参照,通过DEM面误差可视化分析和DEM面误差信息熵模型等方法对ASTER GDEM数据的高程精度做了分析。结果表明:ASTER GDEM数据高程误差在整个地图上分布是否均匀与其高程精度高低无决定关系;在山地和丘陵地形研究区,其数据高程精度要高于SRTM DEM和1∶25万DEM。总体来看,中国东部地区ASTER GDEM数据高程精度整体上要高于SRTM DEM和1∶25万DEM,但低于1∶10万DEM。 相似文献
7.
中国地区30 m分辨率SRTM质量评估 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
高分辨率、高质量地形数据有利于地震、火山与滑坡地质灾害等环境变化相关的研究。2014年9月,美国国家地理空间情报局宣布30 m分辨率的SRTM DEM数据逐步向全球用户免费开放。本文对中国境内最新发布的SRTM DEM开展了质量评估与验证工作,讨论了传感器波长、植被覆盖、影像数量等影响DEM质量的关键因素。研究结果表明,30 m分辨率的SRTM DEM高程精度（10 m）与SRTMX DEM相当,并优于ASTER GDEM v2、SRTM v4.1和SRTM v3。 相似文献
8.
基于ICESat/GLAS高度计数据的SRTM数据精度评估——以青藏高原地区为例 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
为全面了解航天飞机雷达测图计划(shuttle Radar topography mission,SRTM)高程数据的精度及误差特征,利用精度更高的ICESat/GLAS激光高度计数据(简称ICESat高度计数据)为参照数据,以具有多种地貌类型的中国青藏高原地区为实验区,采用双线性插值算法分析了SRTM在中国青藏高原地区的高程精度,以及SRTM高程数据与地形因子(坡度和坡向)间的关系。实验结果表明:在青藏高原地区,ICESat高度计数据与相对应的SRTM高程数据高度相关,相关系数高达0.999 8;SRTM的系统误差为2.36±16.48 m,中误差(RMSE)为16.65 m;当坡度低于25°时,SRTM高程数据精度随坡度增大而显著降低。此外,相对于ICESat高度计数据,SRTM在青藏高原地区N,NW和NE方向的测量值偏高,在S,SE和SW方向的测量值偏低。 相似文献
9.
在无控制点的卫星影像正射校正中,大多采用DSM/DEM数据作为辅助数据来消除或限制因地形起伏引起的形变,然而经不同格网密度的DSM/DEM正射校正后的影像对后续处理会产生不同程度的影响,如对地物分类精度产生影响。针对这一问题,本文分别采用不同的DSM/DEM数据(China DSM 15 m、ASTER GDEM 30 m和SRTM 90 m)对资源三号影像进行正射校正,然后对正射校正后影像利用支持向量机进行分类,比较正射校正后影像结果的分类精度。结果表明:在相同重采样方法下,影像经China DSM 15 m DSM正射校正后结果的分类精度优于ASTER GDEM 30 m DEM和SRTM 90 m DEM。 相似文献
10.
全球数字高程产品概述 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
随着世界各国乃至全球信息化和数字化的发展以及全球化热点问题的研究,高精度、高分辨率全球数字高程产品在广泛的应用领域中扮演着越来越重要的角色。为了方便不同用户根据个人需求选择合适的数据产品,本文首先论述了数字高程产品的精度衡量指标,并对其常用的指标进行等价描述,以便不同数字产品之间的比较分析;然后从全球化高程数据的获取方式出发,经由最初的多源数据融合,到后续基于光学立体摄影测量及合成孔径雷达干涉测量InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar)的全球测图,对其发展的ETOPO、GTOPO30、GMTED2010、ASTER GDEM、AW3D30、SRTM及TanDEM-X DEM全球化数据产品的主要性质和特点进行详细介绍,并简单概括了不同数字产品的发展历程。在此基础上,本文以宁夏回族自治区吴忠市一座山脉为例,通过定性及定量对比的方式详细分析了1″及3″经纬度格网分辨率下的数字高程产品。分析表明,对于采用同一种技术手段生产的数字高程产品,AW3D30及ASTER GDEM均展现出相对丰富的地貌细节特征,均优于SRTM及TanDEM-X DEM产品,但ASTER GDEM产品颗粒效应明显,且产品精度较低;而TanDEM-X DEM是从更高分辨率产品重采样获取,因此相对平滑;就数字高程产品的高程精度而言,TanDEM-X DEM产品精度最高,其次为AW3D30及SRTM产品,均远优于由多源数据融合获取的全球数字产品。 相似文献
11.
Xiaoping Du Huadong Guo Xiangtao Fan Junjie Zhu Zhenzhen Yan Qin Zhan 《International Journal of Digital Earth》2016,9(3):252-271
The frequency of coastal flood damages is expected to increase significantly during the twenty-first century as sea level rises in the coastal floodplain. Coastal digital elevation model (DEM) data describing coastal topography are essential for assessing future flood-related damages and understanding the impacts of sea-level rise. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Global Digital Elevation Model (ASTER GDEM) are currently the most accurate and freely available DEM data. However, an accuracy assessment specifically targeted at DEMs over low elevation coastal plains is lacking. The present study focuses on these areas to assess the vertical accuracy of SRTM and ASTER GDEM using Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite, Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (ICESat/GLAS) and Real Time Kinematic (RTK) Global Positioning System (GPS) field survey data. The findings show that DEM accuracy is much better than the mission specifications over coastal plains. In addition, optical remote sensing image analysis further reveals the relationship between DEM vertical accuracy and land cover in these areas. This study provides a systematic approach to assess the accuracy of DEMs in coastal zones, and the results highlight the limitations and potential of these DEMs in coastal applications. 相似文献
12.
Pratima Pandey Surendar Manickam Avik Bhattacharya AL. Ramanathan Gulab Singh G. Venkataraman 《国际地球制图》2017,32(4):442-454
Glaciers have a high impact in the socio-economic sectors including water supply, energy production, flood and avalanches. A high precision digital elevation model (DEM) is required to monitor glaciers and to study various glacier processes. The present study deals with the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the DEM generated from the bistatic TanDEM-X data by comparing it with GPS, Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) data and standard global DEMs such as Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Global DEM (ASTER GDEM). The study area consists of highly undulating glaciated terrain in western Himalaya, India. The results reveal that TanDEM-X is slightly better than SRTM both qualitatively and quantitatively, whereas ASTER GDEM showing maximum discrepancy among the three DEMs. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the TanDEM-X DEM with respect to GPS is 3.5 m at lower relief and 11.9 m at glaciated terrain, against 6.7 and 12.5 m for SRTM and 9.3 and 19.8 m for ASTER GDEM, respectively, for the same sites. On an average, for the whole study area, the RMSE of TanDEM-X is 7.9 m, SRTM is 9.3 m and ASTER GDM is 14.2 m. The RMSE of TanDEM-X, SRTM and ASTER GDEM with respect to ICESat are 16.3, 19.9 and 101.1 m, respectively. It is evident from the analysis that though SRTM is closer to TanDEM-X in terms of accuracy in the mountainous terrain, however, TanDEM-X will be more useful for studying glacier dynamics and topography. 相似文献
13.
This paper compares the accuracy of Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM), Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) C-band and German Aerospace Centre (DLR)-SRTM X-band digital elevation models (DEMs) with the Ziyuan 3 (ZY-3) stereoscopic DEM and ground control points (GCPs). To date, the horizontal error of these DEMs has received little attention in accuracy assessments. Using the ZY-3 DEM as reference, this study examines (1) the horizontal offset between the three DEMs and the reference DEM using the normalised cross-correlation method, (2) the vertical accuracy of those DEMs using kinematic GPS data and (3) the relationship between the three DEMs and the reference ZY-3 DEM. The results show that the SRTM and DLR-SRTM have greater vertical accuracy after applying horizontal offset correction, whereas the vertical accuracy of the ASTER GDEM is less than the other two DEMs. These methods and results can be useful for researchers who use DEMs for various applications. 相似文献
14.
Loudi Yap Ludovic Houetchak Kandé Robert Nouayou Nasser Abdou Ngouh Marie Brigitte Makuate 《International Journal of Digital Earth》2019,12(5):500-524
Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) contain topographic relief data that are vital for many geoscience applications. This study relies on the vertical accuracy of publicly available latest high-resolution (30?m) global DEMs over Cameroon. These models are (1) the ALOS World 3D-30?m (AW3D30), (2) the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission 1 Arc-Second C-Band Global DEM (SRTM 1) and (3) the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Global DEM Version 2 (ASTER GDEM 2). After matching their coordinate systems and datums, the horizontal positional accuracy evaluation was carried out and it shows that geolocation errors significantly influence the vertical accuracy of global DEMs. After this, the three models are compared among them, in order to access random and systematic effects in the elevation data each of them contains. Further, heights from 555 GPS/leveling points distributed all over Cameroon are compared to each DEM, for their vertical accuracy determination. Traditional and robust statistical measures, normality test, outlier detection and removal were used to describe the vertical quality of the DEMs. The test of the normality rejected the hypothesis of normal distribution for all tested global DEMs. Overall vertical accuracies obtained for the three models after georeferencing and gross error removal in terms of Root Mean Square (RMS) and Normalized Median Absolute Deviation (NMAD) are: AW3D30 (13.06?m and 7.75?m), SRTM 1 (13.25?m and 7.41?m) and ASTER GDEM 2 (18.87?m and 13.30?m). Other accuracy measures (MED, 68.3% quantile, 95% quantile) supply some evidence of the good quality of AW3D30 over Cameroon. Further, the effect of land cover and slope on DEM vertical accuracy was also analyzed. All models have proved to be worse in the areas dominated by forests and shrubs areas. SRTM 1 and AW3D30 are more resilient to the effects of the scattering objects respectively in forests and cultivated areas. The dependency of DEMs accuracy on the terrain roughness is evident. In all slope intervals, AW3D30 is performing better than SRTM 1 and ASTER GDEM 2 over Cameroon. AW3D30 is more representative of the external topography over Cameroon in comparison with two others datasets and SRTM 1 can be a serious alternative to AW3D30 for a range of DEM applications in Cameroon. 相似文献
15.
南极数字高程模型DEMs(Digital Elevation Models)是研究极区大气环流模式,南极冰盖动态变化和南极科学考察非常重要的基础数据。目前,科学家已经发布了五种不同的南极数字表面高程模型。这些数据都是由卫星雷达高度计,激光雷达和部分地面实测数据等制作而成。尽管如此,由于海洋与冰盖交接的南极冰盖边缘区随时间的快速变化,有必要根据新的卫星数据及时更新南极冰盖表面高程数据。因此,我们利用雷达高度计数据(Envisat RA-2)和激光雷达数据(ICESat/GLAS)制作了最新的南极冰盖高程数据。为提高ICESat/GLAS数据的精度,本文采用了五种不同的质量控制指标对GLAS数据进行处理,滤除了8.36%的不合格数据。这五种质量控制指标分别针对卫星定位误差、大气前向散射、饱和度及云的影响。同时,对Envisat RA-2数据进行干湿对流层纠正、电离层纠正、固体潮汐纠正和极潮纠正。针对两种不同的测高数据,提出了一种基于Envisat RA-2和GLAS数据光斑脚印几何相交的高程相对纠正方法,即通过分析GLAS脚印点与Envisat RA-2数据中心点重叠的点对,建立这些相交点对的高度差(GLAS-RA-2)与表征地形起伏的粗糙度之间的相关关系,对具有稳定相关关系的点对进行Envisat RA-2数据的相对纠正。通过分析南极冰盖不同区域的测高点密度,确定最终DEM的分辨率为1000 m。考虑到南极普里兹湾和内陆地区的差异性,将南极冰盖分为16个区,利用半方差分析确定最佳插值模型和参数,采用克吕金插值方法生成了1000 m分辨率的南极冰盖高程数据。利用两种机载激光雷达数据和我国多次南极科考实测的GPS数据对新的南极DEM进行了验证。结果显示,新的DEM与实测数据的差值范围为3.21—27.84 m,其误差分布与坡度密切关系。与国际上发布的南极DEM数据相比,新的DEM在坡度较大地区和快速变化的冰盖边缘地区精度有较大改进。 相似文献
16.
SRTM、ASTER GDEM和AW3D是比较有代表性的全球数字高程模型。本文探讨了采用车载动态PPP技术对上述3类模型的区域高程精度进行检核,首先沿广州至肇庆公路进行连续数据采集,采用动态精密单点定位（PPP）技术解算动态点的WGS-84坐标;然后利用EGM2008重力场模型和仪器高获得动态点的正常高;最后采用4种不同的插值方法对SRTM、ASTER GDEM和AW3D模型进行高程检验。检核结果显示：不同的插值方法具有较好的一致性,SRTM3 V4.1、ASTER GDEM V2、AW3D30的高程标准差分别优于3.4 m、4.1 m和3.3 m,均优于其全球标称高程精度;本文检核方法快速高效,有较好的适用性。 相似文献