共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
1996年3月19日新疆阿图什6.9级地震震源破坏特征的研究 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
通过对１９９６年３月１９日新疆阿图什６．９级地震余震分布特征的研究，分析了这次地震震源破裂过程，并结合柯坪断裂带的构造运动、区域应力场的分布特征以及１９７２年以来该带的另外３次６级地震的余震分布方向。探讨了柯坪断裂带附近地区不同构造部位震源破裂扩展方向与强震活动的迁移方向。结果表明，本次地震震源破坏为明显的单侧破裂；震源断错以逆断层为主，区内主要受ＮＷ向压应力。不同地段强震震源破裂扩展具有明显的区 相似文献
2.
1996年3月19日新疆阿图什6.9级地震震源破裂特征的研究 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
通过对1996年3月19日新疆阿图什6．9级地震余震分布特征的研究，分析了这次地震震源破裂过程．并结合柯坪断裂带的构造运动、区域应力场的分布特征以及1972年以来该带的另外3次6级地震的余震分布方向，探讨了柯坪断裂带附近地区不同构造部位震源破裂扩展方向与强震活动的迁移方向．结果表明，本次地震震源破裂为明显的单侧破裂．柯坪断裂带的阿图什震区和柯坪震区，余震分布具有一定规律性，震源破裂基本都为单侧破裂；震源断错以逆断层为主．区内主要受NW向压应力。不同地段强震震源破裂扩展具有明显的区域特征，强余震分布方向是应力集中的体现，它标志着同一构造断裂带附近近期强震活动的迁移方向．在柯坪断裂带上这种规律更为明显。 相似文献
3.
对大地震发生后强余震的震源机制,基于主要地震断层上小余震的时空分布进行了详细研究.近期在中国境内发生的强烈板内地震,如1976年唐山、1975年海城、1976年盐源——宁蒗等地震曾被中国地震台网很好记录.主震刚发生后的小余震以及强余震前后的小余震的震源用 S——P 时间的收敛法进行测定.强余震的断层是依靠这些小余震的震中分布来描绘的.可以看出有三种情况.第一,在主震断层区内,一次强余震发生在较小余震的比较不密集的部位;第二,一次强余震沿断层发生并与主震断层是共轭的;第三,一次强余震在沿平行并离开主震断层的断层上发生.可以认为,地质条件控制着强余震的发生.作为强余震的可能前兆,则有唐山地震的一次强余震,震级为7.1.其发生前,出现一些前震以及在接近主震断层方向上的某些地震台所记录的初动方向有变化.可以设想,这里的应力场在强余震发生前是有所变化的. 相似文献
4.
5.
海城地震震源区的地震尾波衰减特征 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
本文使用简化的能流模型(Frankel，A．et al.,1987)研究了海城地震震源区的地震尾波衰减及介质Q值的时空分布特征。结果表明,使用该方法求得的尾波Q值基本上是介质非弹性吸收的度量；海城7．3级地震前震的Q值较高，约为500，震后显著降低至380，但5．9级最大余震震源区的Q值仍与大震前相同。这可能说明大震发生时该处介质并未破裂。最大余震发生后，整个震源区的平均Q值降至344。但地震前后介质Q值发生明显变化的范围并不大，直径约为20km。 相似文献
6.
7.
2003年伽师6.8级地震序列特征和震源机制的初步研究 总被引：14，自引：0，他引：14
在位于1997-1998年新疆伽师9次6级地震分布区域的东南端，2003年2月24日又发生6．8级地震。结合伽师6．8级地震序列震源机制解结果，对该地震序列的基本特征和震源区应力降等进行了对比分析。结果表明，6．8级地震断层是在北西向的区域应力场挤压作用下产生的倾滑逆断层，震源以单侧破裂为主，破裂方向与极震区走向，以及北西向的主压应力方向一致。震前震源区应力显著增强，震后应力释放较为彻底。中强余震震源机制解与主震有明显差异，表现出震源区应力场处于不稳定的调整阶段，余震震源机制的差异为震后地震趋势的判定提供了依据。 相似文献
8.
山西大同-阳高地震的震源机制及发震模式 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
根据全国地震台网的记录资料及前人对山西大同-阳高地震的研究结果，通过对大同-阳高地震震源机制及大同遥测地震台网的单（多）台小震综合断层面解的研究，结合当地地质构造条件，推断出大同-阳高地震的震源应力场及前震、主震、最大余震的发震断层。通过对大同-阳高地震中余震随时间分布、烈度等震线分布和构造裂缝的研究，给出了大同-阳高地震中几次主要地震的破裂方向、破裂长度等。 相似文献
9.
利用8个流动数字地震台和国家数字地震台站的地震波形记录,测量了2003年4月17日青海德令哈6.7级地震及其主要余震的直达P波、SV波、SH波的初动方向和振幅比,应用Snoke(2003)的测定震源机制解的格点尝试法,测定出德令哈地震序列的48个2.4级以上地震的震源机制解.搜集分析了美国哈佛大学测定的德令哈6.7级主震和2004年二期地震活动中的7个地震的震源机制解.基于余震空间分布特征和对震源机制解特征的分析,讨论了德令哈地震序列的可能断层活动方式和地震的构造含义.结果表明,主震和大部分余震都是沿NWW-SEE走向的逆断层错动,北边的上盘可能沿低角度向北倾的断层面向南仰冲;个别正断层余震可能是震源区挤压变形弧顶区附近发生的局部张性破裂;在二期地震活动中,逆断层和走滑断层都有,走滑断层地震主要发生在震源区东侧.德令哈地震活动是青藏高原东北缘NWW-SEE向延伸的挤压带继续处于隆升活动中的表现,这一继承性新构造运动是德令哈地震序列的可能发震原因. 相似文献
10.
《地震地磁观测与研究》2016,(5)
北京时间2016年1月21日1时13分,在青海省门源县发生M_S 6.4地震。利用喜马拉雅台阵二期部分台站和青海地震台网震后2个月的震相观测数据,采用双差定位方法,对门源地震序列进行重定位研究。重定位结果表明,余震序列呈北西向分布,大致平行于冷龙岭断裂走向,余震展布长度约12 km,90%的余震发生在5—13 km深度范围内。结合震源机制,认为此次地震为向西南倾的高倾角逆冲地震,发震断层为冷龙岭北东侧的次级断裂,断层面走向约131°。震源深度剖面显示,门源地震的余震分布与常见的逆冲型地震余震分布存在差异,可能与该区域深部地质构造和介质结构异常复杂有关。 相似文献
11.
THE STATIC COULOMB STRESS CHANGE OF THE 2014 LUDIAN EARTHQUAKE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE AFTERSHOCKS AND SURROUNDING FAULTS 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 On Aug. 3rd, 2014, a MS6.5 earthquake struck Ludian County, Yunnan Province. It is a typical left-lateral strike-slip event. With the purpose of understanding the influence of the Ludian earthquake, this paper firstly calculates the co-seismic Coulomb failure stress changes of the mainshock with the employment of the finite dislocation source model inversed by other researchers and studies the triggering effect to the aftershocks within a month. We find that 82.43% of the aftershocks are located in the Coulomb stress increasing area(ΔCFS>0.01MPa), therefore, most of the aftershocks are triggered by the mainshock. Then, regarding the surrounding active faults as the receive faults, the Coulomb stress changes of the mainshock are calculated to investigate the impact on the faults nearby. The result shows that only the northeast end of the west branch and northeast part of the east branch of Zhaotong-Ludian faults have been brought to failure. However, the other faults such as Daliangshan Fault, Lianfeng Fault, Zemuhe Fault, Xiaojiang Fault and Mabian-Yanjin Fault are unloaded after the Luidian event, so the possibility of future earthquake is decreased around these faults. Besides, when the optimal failure plane is chosen as the receive fault of the Coulomb stress changes, the Ludian earthquake always has good triggering effect to the aftershocks no matter which source models and effective friction coefficients are chosen. 相似文献
12.
兰州地区活动构造的基本特征 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
兰州地区发育了NWW向和NWW向2组主导性活动构造带。大致以河口为界，东部地区主要为NWW向的马衔山－兴隆山左旋逆走滑活动断裂系，其新活动明显，是区内的主要控震断裂，1125年兰州7级地震就发生在其中的马衔山北缘断裂带的西端。河口以西为拉脊山北缘断裂和庄浪河断裂等1组NWW向的弧形逆冲断褶带，变形方式以断裂扩展褶皱为主，其新活动可能导致了138年金城－陇西63／4级地震、1440年永登61／4级地震和1995年永登5.8级地震的发生。兰州市区所在的兰州盆地则夹持在上述2组活动构造之间，其内同样发育了NWW向和NWW向的次级断裂，如刘家堡断裂、金城关断裂、雷坛河断裂及深沟桥断裂等，其上具有孕育和发生中强震的构造条件。 相似文献
13.
从1982年10月19日卢龙6.2级地震余震近场数字地震资料的391条记录中， 挑选出可用于精确定位的171条地震事件记录，采用Hypoinverse定位方法对45个事件进行了重定位. 精确定位的震中分布显示出一卧倒的反ldquo;Frdquo;形活动地震构造的形态， 两条NNE向断裂被一条WNW向断裂所截断，两组断裂呈脆性断裂常见的共轭状态产出， NNE向的断层正在相互贯通，卢龙附近的滦河河谷发育成了四面断裂包围的断陷盆地雏形. 卢龙地震的发震构造是一个走滑兼张性的断裂组合， 这样的构造与张家口——渤海地震带的整体活动习性相符， 也反映了张渤带作为一个二级地块的分界截断NNE向的一系列断层所起的作用. 相似文献
14.
采用与永登地震相同的方法,研究了1996年6月1日天祝-古浪5.4级地震前后地壳介质剪切波分裂、电性各向异性随时间的变化特征.结果表明临震前电性主轴、快S偏振方向都是从北偏西方向转为北偏东,而该次地震的P轴为北偏东50°,三者总体上是一致的.由于该次地震与松山电磁台同处一个断层构造上,因此视电阻率变化在各频段均较强,但ρyx比ρxy变化大,这一点与永登地震不同.另外,由于收集的小震资料较少,快慢S波时间延迟的分析结果没能反映出应力强度的积累,另一个原因可能是该次地震孕育与永登地震后应力调整纠缠在一起的结果(两者距离120多公里). 相似文献
15.
利用中国数字地震台网（ＣＤＳＮ）兰州台短周期数字地震仪的记录资料,研究了１９９５年甘肃永登ＭＳ５．８地震前后,发生在永登地区小地震的Ｓ波波谱参数,获得以下结果：（１）在永登地震前２年左右,该地区小地震的ＳＣ波波谱拐角频率ｆＣ逐渐下降,由原来的２．４Ｈｚ下降到１．８Ｈｚ．（２）直达波Ｓｇ和地壳内中间层反射波ＳＣ的波谱高频衰减斜率比值γ则先逐渐上升,在临震前１６个月逐渐下降,在下降过程中发生了永登地震,以后又逐渐恢复．（３）用直达横波Ｓｇ的谱参数求出的介质品质因数ＱＳｇ在永登地震前后有较明显的异常变化 相似文献
16.
由 P 波初动符号资料在 DJS-6机上计算了主震及17个较大余震的断层面解,并按照有限移动源模式测定了主震及三个最大余震的震源参数.主震是发生在一个近似直立的右旋走滑断层上,走向 N30°E,破裂方式为不对称的双侧破裂,以2.7公里/秒的平均速度向北东传播70公里,向南西传播45公里.测定的主震震源参数例如平均位错136厘米,地震矩1.24×1027达因·厘米,应力降12巴等.大多数ML>5.0的余震是发生在主破裂面附近及主破裂面两端的扩展分支上,该扩展分支位于膨胀符号区并与主破裂偏离80°左右.较大余震的多数亦集中在这两个扩展分支上.本文试图从理论上分析这种断裂扩展的力学特征.对于脆性材料的复合变形情形,破裂不再沿原来平面扩展,而是与原来平面偏离一个角度的另一面内扩展.并提出一个力学模型,计算了断层扩展角,计算结果与观测事实比较吻合.根据以上结果,本文讨论了唐山地震特点及发生的力学条件,认为唐山地震不同于发生在大断层上能用粘滑机制解释的那类地震,它和海城地震类似的是,除水平应力场作用外,还可能有地下物质的变迁,由于这种变迁使局部地壳受到垂直力.它和海城地震不同的是,它发生在一个比较均匀的脆性介质内,因而能够积累能量发生大震而没有前震. 相似文献
17.
A strong earthquake with magnitude MS6.2 hit Hutubi, Xinjiang at 13:15:03 on December 8th, 2016(Beijing Time). In order to better understand its mechanism, we performed centroid moment tensor inversion using the broadband waveform data recorded at stations from the Xinjiang regional seismic network by employing gCAP method. The best double couple solution of the MS6.2 mainshock on December 8th, 2016 estimated from local and near-regional waveforms is strike:271°, dip:64ånd rake:90° for nodal plane I, and strike:91°, dip:26ånd rake:90°for nodal plane Ⅱ; the centroid depth is about 21km and the moment magnitude(MW)is 5.9. ISO, CLVD and DC, the full moment tensor, of the earthquake accounted for 0.049%, 0.156% and 99.795%, respectively. The share of non-double couple component is merely 0.205%. This indicates that the earthquake is of double-couple fault mode, a typical tectonic earthquake featuring a thrust-type earthquake of squeezing property.The double difference(HypoDD)technique provided good opportunities for a comparative study of spatio-temporal properties and evolution of the aftershock sequences, and the earthquake relocation was done using HypoDD method. 486 aftershocks are relocated accurately and 327 events are obtained, whose residual of the RMS is 0.19, and the standard deviations along the direction of longitude, latitude and depth are 0.57km, 0.6km and 1.07km respectively. The result reveals that the aftershocks sequence is mainly distributed along the southern marginal fault of the Junggar Basin, extending about 35km to the NWW direction as a whole; the focal depths are above 20km for most of earthquakes, while the main shock and the biggest aftershock are deeper than others. The depth profile shows a relatively steep dip angle of the seismogenic fault plane, and the aftershocks dipping northward. Based on the spatial and temporal distribution features of the aftershocks, it is considered that the seismogenic fault plane may be the nodal plane I and the dip angle is about 271°. The structure of the Hutubi earthquake area is extremely complicated. The existing geological structure research results show that the combination zone between the northern Tianshan and the Junggar Basin presents typical intracontinental active tectonic features. There are numerous thrust fold structures, which are characterized by anticlines and reverse faults parallel to the mountains formed during the multi-stage Cenozoic period. The structural deformation shows the deformation characteristics of longitudinal zoning, lateral segmentation and vertical stratification. The ground geological survey and the tectonic interpretation of the seismic data show that the recoil faults are developed near the source area of the Hutubi earthquake, and the recoil faults related to the anticline are all blind thrust faults. The deep reflection seismic profile shows that there are several listric reverse faults dipping southward near the study area, corresponding to the active hidden reverse faults; At the leading edge of the nappe, there are complex fault and fold structures, which, in this area, are the compressional triangular zone, tilted structure and northward bedding backthrust formation. Integrating with geological survey and seismic deep soundings, the seismogenic fault of the MS6.2 earthquake is classified as a typical blind reverse fault with the opposite direction close to the southern marginal fault of the Junggar Basin, which is caused by the fact that the main fault is reversed by a strong push to the front during the process of thrust slip. Moreover, the Manas earthquake in 1906 also occurred near the southern marginal fault in Junggar, and the seismogenic mechanism was a blind fault. This suggests that there are some hidden thrust fault systems in the piedmont area of the northern Tianshan Mountains. These faults are controlled by active faults in the deep and contain multiple sets of active faults. 相似文献
18.
本文利用海城地震的MS>3.5的5个前震和MS>3.0的18个余震资料,根据文献[2]提供的方法,确定了这些地震断层面破裂方向及破裂传播速度。在海城震区平面上展布结果表明,地震断层面破裂方向与北东向和北西向区域断裂构造走向、震后产生的地裂缝分布方位、地震烈度等震线形态相一致。进一步证明海城7.3级地震前后,不仅与大震断层走向一致的北西向断裂有强烈活动,而且北东向构造也有显著活动。说明后者对海城地震的孕育和发生也起了重要作用。因此,海城地震的发生是两组近于共轭构造活动的结果。 相似文献
19.
LI Cui-ping TANG Mao-yun GUO Wei-ying HUANG Shi-yuan WANG Xiao-long GAO Jian 《地震地质》2019,41(3):603-618
The Wulong MS5.0 earthquake on 23 November 2017, located in the Wolong sap between Wenfu, Furong and Mawu faults, is the biggest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the southeastern Chongqing. It occurred unexpectedly in a weak earthquake background with no knowledge of dramatically active faults. The complete earthquake sequences offered a significant source information example for focal mechanism solution, seismotectonics and seismogenic mechanism, which is helpful for the estimation of potential seismic sources and level of the future seismic risk in the region. In this study, we firstly calculated the focal mechanism solutions of the main shock using CAP waveform inversion method and then relocated the main shock and aftershocks by the method of double-difference algorithm. Secondly, we determined the seismogenic fault responsible for the MS5.0 Wulong earthquake based on these calculated results. Finally, we explored the seismogenic mechanism of the Wulong earthquake and future potential seismic risk level of the region.
The results show the parameters of the focal mechanism solution, which are:strike24°, dip 16°, and rake -108° for the nodal plane Ⅰ, and strike223°, dip 75°, and rake -85° for the nodal plane Ⅱ. The calculations are supported by the results of different agencies and other methods. Additionally, the relocated results show that the Wulong MS5.0 earthquake sequence is within a rectangular strip with 4.7km in length and 2.4km in width, which is approximately consistent with the scales by empirical relationship of Wells and Coppersmith(1994). Most of the relocated aftershocks are distributed in the southwest of the mainshock. The NW-SE cross sections show that the predominant focal depth is 5~8km. The earthquake sequences suggest the occurrence features of the fault that dips northwest with dip angle of 63° by the least square method, which is largely consistent with nodal planeⅡof the focal mechanism solution. Coincidentally, the field outcrop survey results show that the Wenfu Fault is a normal fault striking southwest and dipping 60°~73° by previous studies. According to the above data, we infer that the Wenfu Fault is the seismogenic structure responsible for Wulong MS5.0 earthquake.
We also propose two preliminary genetic mechanisms of "local stress adjustment" and "fluid activation effect". The "local stress adjustment" model is that several strong earthquakes in Sichuan, such as M8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, M7.0 Luzhou earthquake and M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, have changed the stress regime of the eastern margin of the Sichuan Basin by stress transference. Within the changed stress regime, a minor local stress adjustment has the possibility of making a notable earthquake event. In contract, the "fluid activation effect" model is mainly supported by the three evidences as follows:1)the maximum principle stress axial azimuth is against the regional stress field, which reflects NWW-SEE direction thrusting type; 2)the Wujiang River crosscuts the pre-existing Wenfu normal fault and offers the fluid source; and 3)fractures along the Wenfu Fault formed by karst dissolution offer the important fluid flow channels. 相似文献