首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
以东北地区的地学断面及其相关资料为基础,分析了郯庐断裂北带地区的地壳-上地幔结构特征与不同地壳构造单元地震活动性之间的关系.结果表明:郯庐断裂北带两侧的壳幔结构存在明显差异,断裂带本身的发育与壳幔结构变异带关系密切;断裂的活动特点及分段明显受到地壳介质力学特性影响;郯庐断裂北带地区软流层的起伏与地貌形态呈明显的镜像关系,前者还制约着不同地壳构造单元的构造活动性及变形方式;郯庐断裂北带地区南、北两端地震较为活跃地段均与壳内低速 高导层发育地段相对应的事实,证明了刚性地块中壳幔结构较为复杂的活动断裂段是构成中强地震的主要控震构造.   相似文献   

2.
本文应用航空磁测资料及其它地球物理资料,研究郯庐断裂带的构造特征与强震活动。文章具体地记述了郯庐断裂带的位置、展布及深部延伸情况等。对郯城以南隐伏断裂地段,用大、中比例尺航磁资料进行了研究。认为昌邑-大店断裂和安丘-莒县断裂是郯庐断裂带的主断裂,延伸到玄武岩层后合并进入地幔。 最后,文章通去磁异常(场)特征,探索强震活动规律,并为1668年8.5级地震震中位置的修正提供了补充依据  相似文献   

3.
<正>郯庐断裂带庐江段是郯庐断裂带中南段地震前兆重点监视区域之一,NW向梅山-龙河口断裂、金寨-东汤池断裂、青山-晓天断裂都与郯庐断裂带交汇于此段,该段有大量的温泉出露,温泉水氡测项记录到了一些大震的同震响应、震后效应,也捕捉到了一些区域地震的前兆异常。为了更好地监视郯庐断裂带断层的活动,引进了跨断层土壤气监测新技术,探索郯庐断裂带土壤气地球化学特征,提炼适合郯庐断裂带特  相似文献   

4.
郯庐断裂带是中国东部重要的活动断裂带和边界构造带,其鲁苏段全新世活动断层的空间展布和古地震序列是地学关注的焦点问题,也是准确评价区域地震危险性的重要参数.以往研究工作多集中在郯庐断裂带地表地貌现象明显且有强震记录的山东段,而江苏段则研究程度相对较低,有关郯庐断裂带江苏段全新世活动断层范围和古地震序列问题存在争议.本文利用野外地质地貌调查、浅层地震勘探、钻孔联合剖面以及古地震探槽等多层次综合方法,重点开展郯庐断裂带江苏段全新世活动断层的分布和古地震序列研究.结果显示全新世时期,安丘-莒县断裂是郯庐断裂带江苏段的主要活动断层,且江苏全段该断层都是全新世活动断层.通过对比宿迁闸-皂河镇断裂南北安丘-莒县断裂的断层地貌和断层最新活动时间,并结合宿迁闸-皂河镇断裂在第四纪没有活动过等证据,推测该断层在全新世时期并不是区域阻碍破裂的断层.探槽揭示郯庐断裂带江苏段全新世两次古地震事件,事件Ⅰ限定在(6.2±0.3)-(13.4±0.7)ka B.P.之间,而事件Ⅱ限定在(2.5±0.1)ka B.P.到现今,全新世两次古地震间隔较长.基于构造类比法,安丘-莒县断裂具有深部孕震的构造特点,是区域未来强震的潜在发震构造.  相似文献   

5.
郯庐断裂带新沂-五河段晚第四纪活动的新证据   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
郯庐断裂带对中国东部地区影响重大。已有研究表明,郯庐断裂带新沂-五河段第四纪以来有明显的新活动迹象。本文在前人工作的基础上,围绕郯庐断裂带新沂-五河段开展地震地质调查,在重点地段进行探槽开挖,结合断裂沿线地震活动分析,对郯庐断裂带新沂-五河段活动习性及未来地震危险性等进行了探讨。本文补充的很多第一手资料,可为研究郯庐断裂带新沂-五河段大地震复发规律及地震中长期预测等提供有价值的参考依据。  相似文献   

6.
郯庐断裂带明光-庐江段遥感特征分析   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
郑颖平  方良好  疏鹏  路硕 《中国地震》2017,33(1):129-140
利用ETM+、KH卫星影像资料,对郯庐断裂带明光-庐江段开展详细的遥感解译工作,分析其构造地貌及几何展布,并结合现场地质调查加以验证。结果表明,郯庐断裂带明光-庐江段的4条主干断裂在遥感影像中均有表现;西支2条断裂北段明显,南段隐伏,断层沿线发育串珠状湖泊、断塞塘、线性陡坎、弧形等构造;东支2条断裂全段影像线性特征均明显,断层通过处地形凹槽带、线性陡坎、刀砍状断层崖等地貌特征极为发育;野外调查发现,在线性影像特征较明显的地方,断层破碎带均发育,有的宽达几十米,且性质变化明显,该段具有多期多次复杂活动特征。综合遥感解译及现场调查研究认为,本文获得了郯庐断裂带明光-庐江段构造地貌特征及地表几何分布,为该区域地震危险性评价提供了依据。  相似文献   

7.
郯庐断裂带北段及邻区现代地震活动性与应力状态   总被引:8,自引:2,他引:6       下载免费PDF全文
收集了郯庐断裂带北段及邻区自1964年1月至2008年1月的1254个ML≥2.0的地震数据和191条震源机制解、198条原地应力测量数据,通过震中分布、震源深度、应变释放速率的分析计算和震源机制解及其它应力数据的统计,探讨了郯庐北段现今的地震活动性和应力状态。结果表明,郯庐断裂带北段及邻区的地震活动可分为日本海-长白山深震区、郯庐断裂带北段地震区、松辽盆地西缘地震区和松辽盆地内部地震区;郯庐断裂带北段现今地震强度较小,频度较低,但空间差异性显著,依兰-伊通断裂活动性比敦化-密山断裂强,且具有两端强而中间弱的分段活动特点;深震区P轴平均走向为288°,倾角约31°,断裂活动以逆断为主;郯庐断裂带北段附近浅震P轴走向以NEE-SWW向为主,倾角平均26°,T轴走向以NNW-SSE向为主,倾角平均23°,断裂活动以走滑和逆断为主。浅震区和深震区主压应力方位存在差异,这可能是在西太平洋板块低角度高速水平消减产生的NWW向挤压应力作用下,郯庐断裂北段右行走滑派生的次级应力场的影响  相似文献   

8.
郯庐断裂带鲁苏沂沭段由几务平行的深大断裂构成。地震波传播通过郯庐断裂带会产生多次的反射与折射,适当的条件下会产生断层隔震效应。本文报告了江苏地区在汶川地震中的人员反应,根据弹性波传播理论分析了江苏境内的汶川地震记录。分析结果表明,郯庐断裂带在嘉山以北为郯庐断裂带鲁苏沂沭段,几条平行的深大断裂有隔震效应,汶川与嘉山南侧的连线形成一条地震动屏蔽线。在此线以北,郯庐断裂带鲁苏沂沭段阻碍了地震波的传播,其东侧,紧邻郯庐断裂带并为郯庐断裂带屏蔽的强震观测台如宿迁台、新沂台和淮安台都没有触发,这表明了郯庐断裂带对地震波的隔震作用。  相似文献   

9.
1668年郯城8.5级地震的发震构造   总被引:7,自引:0,他引:7  
本文探讨了1668年郯城8.5级地震的震中位置及该次地震的发震构造。认为其震中可定在泉源、李庄、岌山一带,地理位置为东经118.5°,北纬34.8°。认为郯庐断裂带上强震的发生有其一定的规律。郯城地震发生在沂沭断裂带强活动、空间上强转移以及复发间隔长的地段,该地段位于鲁西断块和沂沭断裂带扭曲变形的构造部位,是特定的发震构造。  相似文献   

10.
张月辉  郭斌  王斌  沈笑 《高原地震》2013,25(1):22-26
通过对郯庐断裂带构造进行分段分析,着重研究了1668年7月25日郯城大地震的背景、发震成因和震前异常,并对郯庐断裂带地震活动进行回顾,对比分析近年该带中南段地震活动图像、应力场特征,对郯庐断裂带南段地震活动特点进行探讨。  相似文献   

11.
On the day Wu-wu of the second month in the second year of Chuyuan period in the reign of Emperor Yuan of the western Han Dynasty, that is, April 17, 47 BC, an earthquake occurred near the county seat of Huandao County, Longxi Prefecture. This earthquake caused serious damages to the city wall, government office buildings and civilian houses in the Huandao county seat, many people died, landslides, ground fracturing and spring gushing, etc. occurred. On the basis of textual research on the historical earthquake data and the field investigation, we affirm that the ancient Huandao county seat locates at the new Wangjia Village of Santai, southeast of Wenfeng Town in Longxi County at present. The ancient Huandao county seat is the most seriously damaged area according to the historical earthquake data, so it should be in the meizoseismal area of this earthquake. The epicenter intensity of this earthquake is about 9~10 degrees, and the magnitude of this earthquake is estimated to be about 7. Considering the intensities of other towns damaged during this earthquake, we draw the isoseismal lines of this earthquake, with its major axis directed NNW. The direction of the major axis of the isoseismal lines and the location of the epicenter are approximately consistent with the strike of the western segment of the Gangu-Wushan secondary fault on the northern margin of western Qinling fault zone. This fault segment has clear evidences of new activity during late Holocene, which are characterized by left-lateral strike-slip faulting with normal components; the fault dips NE and faulted the T1-T2 pluvial and alluvial terraces. Up to now, there are some surface deformation traces, such as deeply-incised seismic fault grooves, densely developed structural tensional fractures in the loess stratum, landslides and a series of beaded dolines etc. Combining the results of relocation of small to moderate earthquakes in the research area and comprehensive analysis on their distribution features in plane and profile, we get the results that the causative structure of the 47 BC Longxi earthquake is the western segment of Gangu-Wushan secondary fault on the northern margin of western Qinling fault zone. This fault zone is an important active block boundary fault in the eastern margin of Tibeten block, and has the tectonic condition to generate M ≥ 7 large earthquakes in the past and in the future.  相似文献   

12.
ZHANG Heng's Seismometer and Longxi earthquake in AD 134   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
  相似文献   

13.
Study of historical earthquake is one of the important methods to understand the seismic activities and analyze the seismogenic faults. On the May 25th, 1568 AD, a destructive earthquake occurred to the northeast of the present-day city of Xi'an, Shaanxi Province. Because this earthquake happened shortly after the 1556 M8 earthquake and was regarded as an aftershock, it has received little attention in previous studies. Previous earthquake catalogue agreed in assigning a magnitude 6 3/4 to this earthquake but had different epicentral locations and seismic intensity, and the seismogenic structure remains ambiguous. Based on textual research of historical earthquake and field investigation, the Jingyang County, Gaoling County, and Xianning County, were the worst hit area by the earthquake, and the areas, including Yongle Town, Gaozhuang Town at southeastern Jingyang County to Gaoling County and its southeastern present-day Jijia and Zhangbu, should be the mesoseismal area of this earthquake. The epicenter intensity of this earthquake is Ⅸ+(9~10 degrees), and the magnitude is estimated to be 7. The isoseismal lines were drawn to exhibit the various intensities of the areas damaged during the event, with its major axis directed NWW. Intensities reached Ⅸ+ in the zone extending west-northwest parallel to the Weinan-Jingyang Fault. This fault, characterized by a normal fault that developed during the Cenozoic extensional history of the Weihe Basin, dipping to the north at an angle of 60°~80°, is one part of the southern boundary faults in Weihe graben. There are geomorphological and geological evidences of recent activity of the fault during (180±30)a BP to (1 600±30)a BP. At T1-T2 fluvial terraces on the north bank of Weihe River, the scarps were faulted during Ming Dynasty, and sandy soil liquefaction, dense structural tensional fissures and faulted strata are noted in stratigraphic profiles and trenches. Thus, we suggest that this fault can reliably be regarded as being active during Holocene, and re-name the earthquake as the Shaanxi Gaoling earthquake.  相似文献   

14.
The 2008 Wenchuan earthquake occurred along the Longmen Shan fault zone, only five years later, another M7 Lushan earthquake struck the southern segment where its seismic risk has been highly focused by multiple geoscientists since this event. Through geological investigations and paleoseismic trenching, we suggest that the segment along the Shuangshi-Dachuan Fault at south of the seismogenic structure of the Lushan earthquake is active during Holocene. Along the fault, some discontinuous fault trough valleys developed and the fault dislocated the late Quaternary strata as the trench exposed. Based on analysis of historical records of earthquakes, we suggest that the epicenter of the 1327 Tianquan earthquake should be located near Tianquan and associated with the Shuangshi-Dachuan Fault. Furthermore, we compared the ranges of felt earthquakes(the 2013 M7 Lushan earthquake and the 1970 MS6.2 Dayi earthquake)and suggest that the magnitude of the 1327 Tianquan earthquake is more possible between 6½ and 7. The southern segment of the Longmen Shan fault zone behaves as a thrust fault system consisting of several sub-paralleled faults and its deep structure shows multiple layers of decollement, which might disperse strain accumulation effectively and make the thrust system propagate forward into the foreland basin, creating a new decollement on a gypsum-salt bed. The soft bed is thick and does not facilitate to constrain fault deformation and accumulate strain, which produces a weak surface tectonic expression and seismic activity along the southern segment, this is quite different from that of the middle and northern segments of the Longmen Shan fault zone.  相似文献   

15.
公元180年甘肃表氏地震考   总被引:7,自引:0,他引:7       下载免费PDF全文
根据史料记载,各种地震目录均将东汉灵帝光和三年秋(公元180年)表氏地震震中定在甘肃省高台县西(39.4°N,99.5°E),震中烈度Ⅹ度,震级7(1/2).本文通过对历史地震资料的重新考证和表氏新旧县城遗址的实地考察,对公元180年表氏地震的震中位置作了如下修正:震前的表氏县城位于甘肃省肃南县明花区新墩子城,也应是震中所在地,其地理位置为39.6°N、99.3°E,精度2类;震后重建的县城在今骆驼城或草沟井城.通过对史料震害的认真分析,并将本次地震与两汉时期8次6(1/2)级以上地震及高台附近地区9次地震的地震参数、震害和波及范围进行对照,最终将震中烈度修正为Ⅸ—Ⅹ度,震级修正为7级.  相似文献   

16.
在广泛搜集以往研究资料的基础上,运用野外地震地质考察、典型地质剖面和探槽剖面分析、系统取样等方法,研究了苍山-尼山断裂的活动性质、最新活动时代和古地震事件。研究表明:苍山-尼山断裂以左旋走滑运动为主兼有逆冲运动分量;其第四纪晚期以来的活动具有分段性,以甘霖为界,北西段为晚更新世晚期至全新世早期,南东段为晚更新世晚期;有确凿证据的古地震事件有2次,其发生时间分别是距今6.4万年左右(E1)和距今1.4万年左右(E2);另据考证,公元前179年"齐楚地震"也发生在该断裂上。根据历史地震和现代地震的研究成果,分析认为该断裂未来具有发生6.5级左右地震的潜在危险。  相似文献   

17.
A magnitude 7(3/4) earthquake happened in Linfen, Shanxi, on May 18, 1965(the 34th year of Qing Emperor Kangxi). In the Catalogue of Chinese Historical Strong Earthquakes, the epicenter of this earthquake is located at the northwest of Zhangli Village of Xiangfen County and Dongkang Village of Yaodu District, Linfen City(36.0°N, 111.5°E), and the epicentral intensity is Ⅹ. It was inferred by previous studies that Guojiazhuang Fault is the seismogenic structure of the earthquake. In this paper, in cooperation with the Archives of Linfen City and Earthquake Administration of Linfen, the author looked up in details the first-hand materials of the earthquake damage to the ancient town of Linfen and its surrounding areas, and based on this, drew the isoseismals of the earthquake. Through discussions with relevant experts, we consider that it would be more appropriate that the location of the macroscopic epicenter of this earthquake is in Donguan area of the ancient town of Linfen, the epicentral intensity is Ⅺ, and the major axis of the isoseismals is in NWW. Later, in the implementation of "Linfen city active fault detection and seismic risk evaluation", we found two earthquake fault outcrops near the macroscopic epicentral area of the 1695 Linfen earthquake. Shallow seismic exploration lines and drill rows perpendicular to the strike of the fault outcrops were arranged to implement the exploration. The results demonstrate that the right-lateral stepover composed of Guojiazhuang Fault and Liucun Fault, together with the Luoyunshan Fault(Longci segment), were involved in the 1695 Linfen earthquake, the intersection of the faults is the microscopic epicenter of the earthquake, and the above-mentioned three faults are the seismogenic structure of the earthquake. In addition, the seismic geological remains in this region(landslides, earthquake ground cracks, sand emitting channels, etc.) are mainly distributed on the hanging wall of the Guojiazhuang Fault, this proves from another perspective that the earthquake remains is the product of activity of Guojiazhuang Fault in 1695.  相似文献   

18.
对143年甘谷西7级地震史料的新见解   总被引:9,自引:0,他引:9       下载免费PDF全文
根据地震历史资料的考证分析,143年甘谷西地震可能由2次地震组成,其中陇西、汉阳(今甘谷)、武都三郡地震有感区为一次地震,称为南区;张掖、武威、北地(今吴忠)三郡地震有感区为另一次主震,称为北区。南区地震震中大致位于甘谷西,与原定震中位置大体相当,仍称为甘谷西地震,震级达714级左右,震中烈度约Ⅸ~Ⅹ度,发震构造为西秦岭北缘断裂带中段;北区的143年地震震中位于武威以东的腾格里沙漠边缘,震级达712级左右,震中烈度约Ⅹ度,推测其发震构造为祁连山-河西走廊活动断裂系东端的主干活动断裂之一。  相似文献   

19.
On 8 August 8 2017, an MS7.0 earthquake occurred in Jiuzhaigou County, Sichuan Province. Field geological investigations did not find any co-seismic surface rupture in the epicenter area, implying that the seismogenic structure is likely a hidden active fault. Based on the results of the relocated aftershocks, the seismogenic fault was simulated and characterized using the SKUA-GOCAD software. The three-dimensional model of the seismogenic fault was preliminarily constructed, which shows that the main shock of the Jiuzhaigou MS7.0 earthquake occurred at the sharp bending area of the fault surface, similar to the geometry of the active fault that generated several major earthquakes in the Songpan area during 1973-1976. Our study suggests that high seismicity of this area may be closely related to the inhomogeneous geometry of the fault surface. In this work, we collected the historical earthquakes of M ≥ 6.5, and analyzed the geometric and kinematic features of the active faults in the study area. A three-dimensional fault model for the 10 main active faults was constructed, and its limitation in fault modeling was discussed. It could provide evidence for analyzing the seismotectonics of historical earthquakes, exploring the relationships between earthquakes and active faults, and predicting major earthquakes in the future.  相似文献   

20.
1631年湖南省常德地震的再考证   总被引:3,自引:2,他引:1       下载免费PDF全文
1631年(明崇祯4年)在常德附近发生了一次破坏性地震,前人对该地震作过探讨研究,曾给出了4个等震线图和震中定位。文中在重新查阅历史记载资料的基础上,重新绘制了该地震的等震线,其极震区的烈度为Ⅸ度,相对应的震级为级。以该地震内圈等震线的几何中心为震中,根据梅世蓉-萨瓦连斯基有关震中烈度、震级和震源深度之间的统计关系,以及谢毓寿的统计结果,得到的震源深度为15~18km。最后文中还讨论了历史资料考证、判别的问题和不同地基条件的影响  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号