基于Sentinel-1A数据的四川长宁M_S6.0地震同震形变场分析及断层滑动分布反演     

孙凯  孟国杰  洪顺英  黄星  董彦芳 《地震》2020,40(3):15-27

利用大地测量数据研究2019年6月17日四川长宁M_S6.0地震同震形变场特征和发震断层参数, 基于DInSAR技术处理升降轨Sentinel-1A数据获取干涉相位图, 并考虑大气折射效应和余震形变误差实现同震形变场改正。四叉树采样后的形变数据作为反演数据源, 采用弹性半空间分层模型反演发震断层几何面滑动分布。结果表明本次地震发震机制为兼具逆冲和左旋走滑, 矩震级为M_W5.9, 断层破裂尺度达28 km×20 km, 震源深度约9.4 km。升降轨视线向同震形变场在断层两侧呈现形变特征差异, 最大沉降量分别是8.34 cm(升轨)和4.23 cm(降轨), 最大抬升量分别是5.5 cm(升轨)和7.5 cm(降轨); 发震断层走向为302°, 倾角为43°, 平均滑动角为50°, 断层面最大滑动量达到0.28 m。  相似文献   

2016年新疆阿克陶地震Sentinel-1 InSAR同震形变特征     

宋瑞庆  孟国杰  张奎  董彦芳  龚发明 《地震》2018,38(1):17-25

2016年11月25日新疆克孜勒苏州阿克陶县发生M_W6.6地震。 本文利用合成孔径雷达差分干涉测量技术, 对Sentinel-1卫星获取的升、 降轨雷达数据进行了处理, 提取了该次地震的同震形变场, 并结合形变场特征与震源机制解, 采用梯度下降法反演发震断层的滑动分布。 结果表明, 升、 降轨LOS向同震形变场在发震断层两侧具有明显不同的形变特征, 主要形变区域分布在断层两侧, 升轨LOS向形变量可达-8.2 cm与11.2 cm, 降轨LOS向形变量可达-21.4 cm与13.1 cm; 反演的升、 降轨干涉形变场与InSAR测量值之间的残差得到有效控制, 大部分的残差介于±5 cm之间; 断层滑动分布主要集中于沿断层面深约2~18 km处, 最大滑动量位于沿断层面深约7 km处可达0.96 m; 平均滑动角约182.29°, 最大滑动处的滑动角约197.13°, 两个滑动分布中心的滑动角均接近180°, 表明阿克陶地震为一典型的右旋走滑破裂性事件; 当剪切模量取32 Gpa时, 反演的发震断层地震矩M₀可达9.75×10¹⁸, 相当于矩震级M_W6.60, 与地震波形反演结果一致。  相似文献   

利用考虑地形起伏的反演方法获取2017年伊拉克M_W7.3地震的断层参数及滑动分布     

余宏远  李伟  王文达 《地震》2020,40(4):63-75

2017年11月13日伊拉克北部地区苏莱曼尼亚省发生了M_W7.3地震, 造成了重大的人员和经济损失。 本文利用升降轨的Sentinel-1和降轨的ALOS-2卫星的SAR数据, 通过差分干涉测量技术获取了该地震的同震形变场, 联合DInSAR和MAI技术, 采用抗差最小二乘法求解该地震的同震三维形变场。 基于改进的考虑地形起伏的均匀位错模型反演确定了发震断层的断层参数, 最后基于非均匀位错模型得到了发震断层的分布式滑动分布模型。 结果显示: ALOS-2卫星降轨轨道观测到的伊拉克地震引起的LOS向地表形变最大为55.8 cm抬升和47.9 cm下沉; Sentinel-1卫星观测到的伊拉克地震引起的LOS向地表形变为: 升轨轨道最大为87.9 cm抬升和17.1 cm下沉; 降轨轨道最大为55.6 cm抬升和38 cm下沉; 相对于前人的研究成果, 本文利用改进的考虑地形起伏的反演方法得到的发震断层几何参数表明发震断层为NNW走向, 倾向角为352°, 同震破裂以逆冲为主, 同时兼有一定的左旋走滑分量。 基于均匀位错模型反演得到的断层滑动分布结果表明, 同震破裂未延伸至地表, 主要滑动量集中在12~18 km, 最大滑动量位于15 km深度, 达到4.3m, 反演得到的矩震级为M_W7.35, 与UGSG、 GCMT等机构给出的结果一致。  相似文献   

利用InSAR获取2020年新疆于田Mw6.3地震同震形变场与断层滑动分布反演     

刘超亚  董彦芳  洪顺英  孟国杰  黄星  刘泰 《地震》2021,41(2):62-79

本文基于InSAR技术, 利用欧空局Sentinel-1A/ B升降轨SAR数据, 提取了2020年6月26日新疆于田M_W6.3地震的同震形变场。 利用升、 降轨同震形变场约束, 分别采用MPSO算法和Bayesian方法反演此次地震发震断层均匀滑动的几何参数, 并进行对比。 然后采用SDM方法获得发震断层非均匀滑动分布, 并分析了同震库仑应力变化及其对周边断层的应力扰动。 结果表明, 同震形变场以NS向为长轴, 总体呈现西部沉降而东部隆升的特点, 而且隆升量明显小于沉降量; 滑动分布反演表明发震断层的平均滑动量为0.13 m, 平均滑动角为-104.56°, 此次地震为典型的正断破裂事件, 最大滑动量约0.55 m, 最大滑动量处滑动角为-105.2°, 位于断层倾向深度14.42 km, 释放的地震矩能量约3.65×10¹⁸ N·m, 相当于矩震级M_W6.3; 同震库仑应力变化对西部琼木孜塔格断层、 硝尔库勒南缘断层等起到应力卸载作用, 对北部的木孜鲁克—鲸鱼湖断层起到应力加载作用, 结合同震库仑应力对周围断层的扰动情况, 此次地震可能对琼木孜塔格断裂带和木孜鲁克—鲸鱼湖断裂带的西端影响较大。  相似文献   

2008年于田M_W7.2地震滑动分布反演及三维同震形变场解算     

余晨晖  申旭辉  张景发  李永生 《地震》2018,38(3):24-34

基于ENVISAT ASAR升降轨数据, 利用InSAR获取2008年于田M_W7.2地震同震形变场; 采用SDM反演本次地震断层滑动分布; 使用PSCMP正演获取于田M_W7.2地震南北向模拟形变量, 并结合升降轨同震形变场, 解算三维同震形变场。 同震形变场分析表明, 2008年于田M_W7.2地震以正断为主, 且带有走滑运动特征, 破裂带走向为NNE向。 同震滑动分布反演结果显示, 断层沿走向被分为4段F1、 F2、 F3、 F4, 其滑动分布集中在0~14 km区间, 以F2、 F3段为主, 最大滑动量约5.31 m, 位于F2段深部2.76 km处; 沿破裂带走向, 左旋走滑位移与垂直位移比值有增大的趋势; 反演获得的地震矩M₀=5.58×10¹⁹N·m, 相当于矩震级M_W7.1。 三维同震形变场解算结果显示, 断层上盘整体表现为沉降, 断层下盘整体表现为隆升, 且沉降量明显大于隆升量, 表明地震以正断破裂为主; 除靠近断裂带中上部表现为向东南运动外, 上盘整体上表现为向西南运动; 断层下盘则整体表现为向东北运动, 证明破裂兼有左旋走滑运动。 滑动分布反演、 正演与三维同震形变场解算结果皆表明, 于田M_W7.2地震破裂以正断为主, 且带有一定的左旋走滑。  相似文献   

基于InSAR分析2015年尼泊尔M_W7.8地震形变场特征及断层滑动分布反演     

徐小波  马超  洪顺英  连达军  张迎峰 《地震》2020,40(4):76-89

2015年4月25日尼泊尔发生了M_W7.8地震, 本文基于震前、 震后两景Sentinel-1A雷达影像, 采用D-InSAR两轨差分干涉法提取了此次地震的同震形变场。 结果显示, 同震形变场位于喜马拉雅造山带—主边界逆冲断裂(MBT)和主前锋逆冲断裂(MFT)附近, 形变场整体表现为自西北向往东南方向延伸近150 km的纺锤形包络状, 以大面积隆起抬升形变为主, 视线向最大隆升形变达1.18 m, 抬升区北侧存在一小沉陷区, 以InSAR观测值定位同震最大形变中心。 基于均匀介质弹性半空间模型(Okada模型)与InSAR观测数据反演了断层滑动分布。 反演结果表明该地震属于典型逆冲型地震, 发震断层为主喜马拉雅逆冲断裂(MHT), 同震破裂从主喜马拉雅逆冲断裂(MHT)向上沿着主前锋逆冲断裂(MFT)传递。 基于InSAR同震形变场局部形变细节, 结合震区地质背景、 断裂分布及断层运动特征, 获得了同震破裂拟出露地表迹线。  相似文献   

利用InSAR资料反演缅甸M_w6.8地震断层滑动分布          下载免费PDF全文

周辉  冯光财  李志伟  许兵  雷广渊 《地球物理学报》2013,56(9):3011-3021

2011年3月24日缅甸东北部发生M_w6.8级地震.本文利用覆盖该地区的升降轨ALOS PALSAR数据,获取了该次地震的同震形变场,并采用灰度配准技术获取了其地表破裂位移.针对影像中因轨道不精确造成的非线性长波长误差,本文采用二次多项式曲面法予以去除,获取了更为精确的同震形变场.最后,基于弹性半空间形变模型反演了该地震的断层滑动分布.结果表明,该地震断层滑动以左旋走滑为主,兼具少许的倾滑运动分量,断层滑动主要集中分布在断层面0~10 km深度范围,最大滑动量达5 m,位于地表以下5 km深处.反演获得的地震标量矩为2.49×10¹⁹N·m,震级约为M_w6.8级.  相似文献   

基于升降轨Sentinel-1 SAR数据研究2020年新疆于田M_S6.4地震震源机制     

康帅  刘传金  朱良玉  季灵运 《地震》2021,41(2):80-91

2020年6月26日新疆于田县发生M_S6.4地震。 本文先利用Sentinel-1A/B卫星升、 降轨SAR数据, 结合InSAR技术提取此次地震的同震形变场; 并以同震形变场为约束, 利用贝叶斯方法的均匀滑动模型反演发震断层的几何参数; 最后基于梯度下降法(Steepest Decent Method, SDM)来确定发震断层更为精细的滑动分布。 研究结果表明: InSAR形变场的分布主要沿北北东方向, 东西方向跨度约40 km, 南北方向跨度约30 km, 形变特征为西侧沉降与东侧隆升, 西侧最大沉降约200 mm, 东侧最大隆升约70 mm。 于田地震发震断层为一条走向187.68°、 倾角59.78°、 滑动角77.76°的隐伏断层; 于田地震的宏观震源深度为6.29 km, 距震级M_W6.19。 断层滑动分布主要集中在沿走向7~21 km与倾向4~11 km的区域内, 平均滑动量约0.2 m, 在沿倾向7~8 km处的最大滑动量约0.97 m, 同震位错主要表现为正断运动。  相似文献   

2014年美国加州纳帕M_W6.1地震断层参数的Sentinel-1A InSAR反演          下载免费PDF全文

李永生  冯万鹏  张景发  李振洪  田云锋  姜文亮  罗毅 《地球物理学报》2015,58(7):2339-2349

2014年8月24日,在美国加州旧金山海湾北部的纳帕地区发生了MW6.1地震.发震断层是西纳帕断裂系统中的一部分,但是该断层之前并未被足够重视.本文利用欧洲空间局最近发射成功并刚刚投入使用的Sentinel-1A卫星获取的第一对同震干涉像对(20140807-20140831),得到了该地震的地表同震形变场,结合震后24h内区域GPS同震形变资料作为约束条件,反演了纳帕地震的断层几何参数以及滑动分布.Sentinel-1A干涉结果表明,此次地震造成了明显的地面形变,视线向最大抬升和最大沉降量均达到了10cm.联合反演结果表明,该发震断层的走向为344°,倾角为80°.主要破裂以右旋走滑为主,平均倾滑角为-146.5°,最大倾滑量达到了1.1m,位于地表下约4km,存在明显的滑动亏损现象.此次地震,累计释放地震矩达1.5×1018 N·m,约合矩震级MW6.1.该结果略小于InSAR单独约束结果,可能与Sentinel-1A像对中包含的快速震后形变分量有关.  相似文献   

GEODETIC AND TELESEISMIC CONSTRAINTS ON SLIP DISTRIBUTION OF 2015 M_W6.4 PISHAN EARTHQUAKE          下载免费PDF全文

CHEN Yun-guo  HE Ping  DING Kai-hua  LI Shui-ping  WANG Qi 《地震地质》2019,41(1):137-149

On July 3^rd, 2015, a M_W6.4 earthquake occurred on Pishan County, Xinjiang, located in the front of western Kunlun thrust belt, which is the largest earthquake(M_W6.0~7.0)in the past 40 years in this region. In this study, we collected both the near-filed geodetic coseismic deformation observations including 4 GPS sites and one high-resolution ALOS-2 InSAR imagery, and far-field teleseismic P waveforms from 25 stations provided by IRIS/USGS, to invert the fault parameters(strike and dip)and coseismic rupture model of 2015 M_W6.4 Pishan earthquake. Using the finite fault theory, a non-linear simulated annealing algorithm was employed to resolve our joint inversion problem. The strike (120°~130°) and dip angle(35°~40°)of optimal models are different from that of some previous studies, and the dip change is strongly constrained by combined data than that of strike. In fixing the geometric parameters of optimal fault model, we also considered data weight(5)(geodetic data/teleseismic P waveforms)and constrained weight from moment and smooth factor(2.5). Clearly, our results indicate that the slip distribution mainly concentrates in the depth range from 9 to 16km and a length range of 20km along the strike direction, which is similar to the spatial distribution of the relocated aftershocks. The maximum slip is~95cm. The seismic moment release is 5.45×10¹⁸N·m, corresponding to M_W6.42. Compared with the single data set, geodetic data or teleseismic waveform, our joint inversion model could simultaneously constrain the seismic moment and slip distribution well, thus avoiding effectively a lower-resolution rupture distribution determined by teleseismic-only inversion and a bias released moment estimated by the geodetic-only inversion. Importantly, we should consider both the near-field geodetic data and far-field teleseismic data in retrieving the rupture model for accurately describing the seismogenic structure of active fault in western Kunlun region.  相似文献   

基于Sentinel-1A数据反演漾濞M_S6.4地震的同震形变场及断层几何参数          下载免费PDF全文

朱俊文  姚赟胜  张波 《地震工程学报》2021,43(4):784-790

2021年5月21日晚21时48分,云南省大理州漾濞县(震中:25.67°N,99.87°E)发生M_S6.4地震,震源深度8 km。为快速获得此次地震同震形变场及断层几何参数,研究该次地震的发震构造等,文章基于震前、震后的sentinel-1A卫星升降轨SAR数据进行二轨法差分雷达干涉测量(DInSAR),并基于Okada弹性半空间位错模型反演断层几何参数。研究结果如下:(1)此次地震造成的同震形变场长约19 km,宽约20 km;(2)升轨雷达视线向最大形变约为8.2 cm,降轨雷达视线向最大形变约为8.7 cm;(3)地震断层走向为313.7°,倾角为87°,滑动角为175°,为右旋走滑型断层,最大滑动量为0.79 m,反演得出的地震矩为1.48×10~(18) N·m,矩震级为M_W6.1。在川滇块体向南挤出的构造背景下,块体西边界的维西—乔后断裂、红河断裂发生右旋走滑,本次地震便是维西—乔后断裂南段分支断裂右旋走滑活动的体现。  相似文献   

利用InSAR技术研究2016年青海门源M_W5.9地震同震形变场及断层滑动分布     

赵强  王双绪  蒋锋云  李宁 《地震》2017,37(2):95-105

2016年1月21日, 青海省门源县冷龙岭断裂带附近发生了M_W5.9地震。 基于Sentinel-1A影像, 采用差分干涉雷达测量技术研究了此次地震产生的同震形变场, 结果表明, 门源地震的形变影响范围约20~30 km, 形变态势在升降轨道形变场均显示为隆升, 基本沿冷龙岭断裂呈近似同心圆展布, 推测可能是冷龙岭断裂与民乐—大马营断裂之间的一条逆断层, 沿雷达视线方向最大形变量级约为6 cm。 均匀滑动反演显示门源发震断层长7.3 km, 宽6.2 km, 走向298.6°, 倾角34.5°, 倾向宽度9.5 km, 沿走向滑动量为170 mm, 沿倾向滑动量为460 mm, 矩震级为M_W5.97; 分布式滑动反演显示门源地震以逆冲为主, 兼具少量右旋走滑分量, 滑动量主要集中在沿断层倾向方向, 距离地表5～15 km处, 最大滑动量约0.3 m, 位于断层倾向深度10 km处, 矩震级为M_W5.93。  相似文献   

2020年1月19日新疆伽师MS6.4地震InSAR同震形变场特征及发震构造初步探讨     

温少妍  李成龙  李金 《内陆地震》2020,(1):1-9

基于Sentinel-1 SAR升、降影像,利用D-InSAR技术获取新疆伽师M S6.4地震的同震形变场,结果表明,本次地震引起的同震形变场整体呈近椭圆状分布,形变区东西长约66 km,南北宽约40 km,整个形变场由南部隆升区和北部沉降区组成,南部最大隆升量约7 cm,北部最大沉降量约3 cm。本次地震发生在块体俯冲界面处的低倾角逆冲推覆构造带上,隆升和沉降两个中心均位于逆冲推覆体的上盘,形变主要以隆升形变为主,符合低倾角逆断层中强震的变形特征。在沉降区与隆升区之间干涉条纹连续分布,未出现表征地表破裂位置的空间失相关带,表明地震未引起明显的地表破裂。结合震源机制、余震精定位及区域构造特征,初步推断认为伽师地震的发震构造可能为柯坪塔格推覆构造前缘的N倾的柯坪断裂。  相似文献   

芦山M_S7.0级地震InSAR形变观测及震源参数反演          下载免费PDF全文

刘云华  汪驰升  单新建  张桂芳  屈春燕 《地球物理学报》2014,57(8):2495-2506

2013年4月20四川省芦山县发生M_S7.0级地震,目前的研究资料表明地震发生在龙门山断裂南段,但地表未发现明显破裂.本研究利用InSAR技术与Radarsat-2雷达数据,获取了芦山地震同震的部分形变场,结果表明,近场区域的LOS位移发生视线向隆升,量值在7 cm左右.随后利用弹性半空间的位错模型反演了断层面参数,综合反演结果及震源机制解最终确定了发震断层的初始模型,以形变场观测数据为约束,基于梯度下降法反演获得了断层面上的滑动分布,反演得到的矩震级为M_w6.45级,断层走向213°,倾角39°~43°,最大滑动位于地表以下约13 km深度位置,最大滑动量0.91 m,平均滑动角71°,整体上仍以逆冲滑动为主,兼具左旋走滑.推测在双石-大川断裂以东12 km处展布一条隐伏断裂,为本次的发震断裂.  相似文献   

2020年伽师M_S6.4地震InSAR同震形变与滑动分布特征分析     

木妮拉·局玛洪  艾力夏提·玉山  李瑞  刘代芹  朱治国  陈丽 《震灾防御技术》2022,17(3):549-556

利用Sentinel-1A升轨和降轨数据,基于D-InSAR技术,获取2020年1月19日伽师M_S6.4地震同震形变场,并结合其他研究机构给出的震源机制解参数和已有研究成果,反演得到伽师地震的发震断层几何特征和滑动分布。研究结果表明,伽师地震同震形变在地表有明显差异;升轨同震形变在卫星视线方向北侧抬升55 mm,南侧下降42 mm;降轨同震形变在卫星视线方面北侧抬升63 mm,南侧下降23 mm。通过反演得到发震断层走向为275°,倾角为20°,地震滑动主要分布在地下5 km处,最大滑动量约为0.32 m,平均滑动角为89.3°,累积地震矩为1.46×1018 N·m,合矩震级M_W6.1,发震构造为具有少量走滑性质的逆冲断裂。从发震构造特征、同震滑动分布推测,伽师地震发震构造是柯坪塔格褶皱带滑脱面以上沉积盖层内的逆冲断裂,支持了柯坪推覆体的薄皮构造模型观点。  相似文献   

RESEARCH ON NEOGENE-QUATERNARY STRATIGRAPHIC STRUCTURE AND SHALLOW TECTONIC FEATURES IN THE NORTH SECTION OF DAXING FAULT ZONE BASED ON SHALLOW SEISMIC REFLECTION PROFILING          下载免费PDF全文

HE Fu-bing  XU Xi-wei  HE Zhen-jun  ZHANG Xiao-liang  LIU Li-yan  ZHANG Wei  WEI Bo  NI Jing-bo 《地震地质》1979,42(4):893-908

The Daxing Fault is an important buried fault in the Beijing sub-plain, which is also the boundary fault of the structural unit between Langgu sub-sag and Daxing sub-uplift. So far, there is a lack of data on the shallow tectonic features of the Daxing Fault, especially for the key structural part of its northern section where it joins with the Xiadian Fault. In this paper, the fine stratigraphic classifications and shallow tectonic features of the northern section in the main Daxing Fault are explored by using three NW-trending shallow seismic reflection profiles. These profiles pass through the Daxing earthquake(M6¾)area in 1057AD and the northern section of the main Daxing Fault. The results show that seven strong reflection layers(T₀₁—T₀₃, T_Q and T₁₁—T₁₃)are recognized in the strata of Neogene and Quaternary beneath the investigated area. The largest depth of strong reflection layer(T₁₃)is about 550~850ms, which is interpreted as an important surface of unconformity between Neogene and Paleogene or basement rock. The remaining reflection layers, such as T₀₁ and T_Q, are interpreted as internal interfaces in Neogene to Quaternary strata. There are different rupture surfaces and slip as well as obviously different structural features of the Daxing Fault revealed in three shallow seismic reflection profiles. The two profiles(2-7 and 2-8)show obvious rupture surfaces, which are the expression of Daxing Fault in shallow strata. Along the profile(2-6), which is located at the end of the Daxing fault structure, a triangle deformation zone or bending fracture can be identified, implying that the Daxing Fault is manifested as bending deformation instead of rupture surfaces at its end section. This unique structural feature can be explained by a shearing motion at the end of extensional normal fault. Therefore, the Daxing Fault exhibits obviously different tectonic features of deformation or displacement at different structural locations. The attitude and displacement of the fault at the shallow part are also different to some extent. From the southwest section to the northeast section of the fault, the dip angle gradually becomes gentler(80°~60°), the upper breakpoint becomes deeper(160~600m), and the fault displacement in Neogene to Quaternary strata decreases(80~0m). Three shallow seismic reflection profiles also reveal that the Daxing Fault is a normal fault during Neogene to early Quaternary, and the deformation or displacement caused by the activity of the fault reaches the reflection layer T₀₂. This depth is equivalent to the sedimentary strata of late Early-Pleistocene. Therefore, the geometry and morphology of the Daxing Fault also reveal that the early normal fault activity has continued into the Early Pleistocene, but the evidence of activity is not obvious since the late Pleistocene. The earthquakes occurring along the Daxing Fault, such as Daxing earthquake(M6¾)in 1057AD, may not have much relation with this extensional normal fault, but with another new strike-slip fault. A series of focal mechanism solutions of modern earthquakes reveal that the seismic activity is closely related to the strike-slip fault. The Daxing Fault extends also downwards into the lower crust, and may be cut by the steeply dipping new Xiadian Fault on deep seismic reflection profile. The northern section of the Daxing Fault strikes NNE, with a length of about 23km, arranged in a right step pattern with the Xiadian Fault. Transrotational basins have been developed in the junction between the northern Daxing Fault and the southern Xiadian Fault. Such combined tectonic features of the Daxing Fault and Xiadian Fault evolute independently under the extensional structure background and control the development of the Langgu sub-sag and Dachang sub-sag, respectively.  相似文献   

COSEISMIC DISPLACEMENT AND FAULT SLIP OF THE M_W6.1 NAPA EARTHQUAKE IN AMERICA REVEALED BY SENTINEL-1A INSAR DATA          下载免费PDF全文

ZUO Rong-hu  QU Chun-yan  ZHANG Guo-hong  SHAN Xin-jian  SONG Xiao-gang  WEN Shao-yan  XU Xiao-bo 《地震地质》2016,38(2):278-289

We achieved the coseismic displacements of the Napa M_W6.1 earthquake located in California US occurring on 24 August 2014 by using InSAR data from the newly launched ESA's Sentinel-1A satellite. The 30m×30m ASTER GDEM was used to remove the terrain effect, and phase unwrapping method of branch-cut algorithm was adopted. In order to obtain a better coseismic displacement field, we also tested 90m×90m SRTM data to remove the terrain effect and Minimum Cost Flow algorithm to unwrap the phase. Results showed that the earthquake caused a significant ground displacement with maximum uplift and subsidence of 0.1m and -0.09m in the satellite light of sight(LOS). Based on the Sentinel-1A dataset and sensitivity based iterative fitting(SBIF) method of restrictive least-squares algorithm, we obtained coseismic fault slip distribution and part of the earthquake source parameters. Inversion results show that the strike angle is 341.3°, the dip angle is 80°, rupture is given right-lateral fault, average rake angle is -176.38°, and the maximum slip is ~0.8m at a depth of 4.43km. The accumulative seismic moment is up to 1.6×10¹⁸N·m, equivalent to a magnitude of M_W6.14.  相似文献   

2016年台湾美浓M_W6.4地震震源参数的InSAR和GPS反演          下载免费PDF全文

王乐洋  高华  冯光财 《地球物理学报》2017,60(7):2578-2588

2016年2月6日台湾西南部高雄市美浓区发生了M_W6.4地震.本文结合ALOS2卫星升降轨、Sentinel-1A升轨SAR数据，采用两轨差分干涉技术获取了该区域的同震形变场，形变结果表明震中西北部以抬升为主，最大视线向形变量约为11.2 cm.基于均匀位错模型和多峰值粒子群（MPSO）算法，利用InSAR和GPS形变数据联合反演了美浓地震的断层几何参数，结果表明震源中心位于22.920°N，120.420°E，深度约12 km，发震断层长度约15 km，走向角307°，倾角16.5°，平均滑动角为51.5°，此次地震是以逆冲倾滑兼左旋走滑的破裂模式.利用格网迭代搜索法得到最优倾角为15.7°，GPS和InSAR最优权比为18：1，最优平滑因子为0.06.基于非均匀位错模型，利用非负最小二乘方法进行线性反演，结果显示最大倾滑和走滑量分别为51.7 cm和55.3 cm，对应矩震级为M_W6.38，略小于GCMT （M_W6.4）的结果.通过与已有文献的比较和对该区域断层构造的分析，发现美浓地震的发震断层为单一断层的解释更为合理，我们推测发震断层是位于左镇、后甲里等断层之间的一条东南-西北走向往东北倾斜的盲断层，并初步推测2010年M_W6.3甲仙地震也同该断层有关.  相似文献   

RESEARCH ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF QUATERNARY ACTIVITIES OF SU-XI-CHANG FAULT          下载免费PDF全文

ZHANG Peng  ZHANG Yuan-yuan  XU Han-gang  LIU Jian-da  CHEN Jian-qiang  LI Li-mei  LI Jin-liang  GU Qin-ping  JIANG Xin 《地震地质》2019,41(5):1172-1184

Running across the urban areas of Changzhou, Wuxi and Suzhou, the NW-trending Su-Xi-Chang Fault is an important buried fault in Yangtze River Delta. In the respect of structural geomorphology, hilly landform is developed along the southwest side of the Su-Xi-Chang Fault, and a series of lakes and relatively low-lying depressions are developed on its northeast side, which is an important landform and neotectonic boundary line. The fault controlled the Jurassic and Cretaceous stratigraphic sedimentary and Cenozoic volcanic activities, and also has obvious control effects on the modern geomorphology and Quaternary stratigraphic distribution. Su-Xi-Chang Fault is one of the target faults of the project "Urban active fault exploration and seismic risk assessment in Changzhou City" and "Urban active fault exploration and seismic risk assessment in Suzhou City". Hidden in the ground with thick cover layer, few researches have been done on this fault in the past. The study on the activity characteristics and the latest activity era of the Su-Xi-Chang Fault is of great significance for the prevention and reduction of earthquake disaster losses caused by the destructive earthquakes to the cities of Changzhou, Wuxi and Suzhou. Based on shallow seismic exploration and drilling joint profiling method, Quaternary activities and distribution characteristics of the Su-Xi-Chang Fault are analyzed systematically. Shallow seismic exploration results show that the south branch of the Su-Xi-Chang Fault in Suzhou area is dominated by normal faulting, dipping to the north-east, with a dip angle of about 60° and a displacement of 3~5m on the bedrock surface. The north branch of the Su-Xi-Chang Fault in Changzhou area is dominated by normal faulting, dipping to the south, with a dip angle of about 55°~70° and a displacement of 4~12m on the bedrock surface. All breakpoints of Su-Xi-Chang Fault on the seismic exploration profiles show that only the bedrock surface was dislocated, not the interior strata of the Quaternary. On the drilling joint profile in the Dongqiao site of Suzhou, the latest activity of the south branch of Su-Xi-Chang Fault is manifested as reverse faulting, with maximum displacement of 2.9m in the upper part of Lower Pleistocene, and the Middle Pleistocene has not been dislocated by the fault. The fault acts as normal fault in the Pre-Quaternary strata, with a displacement of 3.7m in the Neogene stratum. On the drilling joint profile in the Chaoyang Road site of Changzhou, the latest activity of the north branch of Su-Xi-Chang Fault is manifested as reverse faulting too, with maximum displacement of 2.8m in the bottom layer of the Middle Pleistocene. The fault acts as normal fault in the Pre-Quaternary strata, with a displacement of 10.2m in the bedrock surface. Combining the above results, we conclude that the latest activity era of Su-Xi-Chang Fault is early Middle Pleistocene. The Su-Xi-Chang Fault was dominated by the sinistral normal faulting in the pre-Quaternary period, and turned into sinistral reverse faulting after the early Pleistocene, with displacement of about 3m in the Quaternary strata. The maximum magnitude of potential earthquake on the Su-Xi-Chang Fault is estimated to be 6.0.  相似文献   

基于InSAR的青海大柴旦地震三维同震形变场获取与震源特征分析   总被引：5，自引：1，他引：4       下载免费PDF全文

温少妍  单新建  张迎峰  王家庆  张国宏  屈春燕  徐小波 《地球物理学报》2016,59(3):912-921

本文利用Envisat ASAR的升、降轨和宽幅数据,通过基于先验知识的最小二乘迭代逼近获取大柴旦2次地震的地表三维同震形变.结果表明,2008年MW6.3地震垂直向形变主要发生在断层南盘,以隆升形变为主,最大隆升量约10cm,北盘沉降量小于等于-1cm.东西向形变在南盘呈向东运动的特征,最大运动量约4cm,北盘向西运动,最大运动量约为-2cm.2009年MW5.8地震垂直向形变显示断层南盘抬升的特征,最大抬升量约27cm,北盘最大沉降量约-3cm.东西向形变表现为南盘向东运动,最大约10cm,北盘向西运动,约为-4cm.可以看出这两次地震均表现为逆冲为主,兼少量左旋走滑的震源特征.视线向结果无法判定同震形变的少量走滑特征,而地表三维分量可以有效地识别出少量左旋还是右旋走滑的震源特性.本文以视线向、垂直向、东西向形变量作为约束条件,利用Okada模型正演了2008年地震同震三维形变场.结果显示,采用逆冲兼少量左旋走滑的发震断层参数,视线向、垂直向、东西向正演结果与观测结果吻合.这也表明采用分解后的地表三维同震形变场可以有效地识别出发震断层的少量左旋走滑特征.  相似文献