首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 421 毫秒
1.
侯梦玲  王宏  赵天良  车慧正 《大气科学》2017,41(6):1177-1190
本文利用GRAPES_CUACE大气化学模式对京津冀地区2015年12月重度雾霾过程进行了模拟和评估。京津冀地区能见度和PM2.5模拟值与观测值的对比表明:该模式能较好地模拟京津冀地区能见度和PM2.5的逐日变化情况,但模式存在对伴随着重污染发生的低能见度模拟偏高的问题。以12月5~10日的重度雾霾过程为重点,针对地面风速、边界层高度、相对湿度、PM2.5及其对能见度的影响进行了详细分析,研究结果表明:污染过程中大部分地区过程平均风速低于2 m s-1,边界层平均高度低于600 m,相对湿度较高。模式低能见度模拟偏高可能因为:(1)模式模拟重雾霾时段的PM2.5极大值浓度偏低。(2)模拟相对湿度存在系统性偏低的误差,这一误差对能见度的影响表现为两方面,一是相对湿度会通过影响可溶性气溶胶的吸湿增长过程影响气溶胶质量浓度,导致气溶胶消光系数的计算偏低;二是目前模式中采用的能见度的参数化公式考虑了相对湿度对气溶胶吸湿增长的影响,没有考虑雾滴的直接消光作用。  相似文献   

2.
PM2.5污染仍然是湖北省冬季大气污染的首要污染类型,且具有明显区域传输特征,重污染过程的空气污染气象条件有别于华北地区,值得关注。采用WRF/Chem不同排放情景下的模拟结果,并结合观测分析,研究了2015年12月—2016年1月湖北省PM2.5重污染过程的气象输送条件及日变化特征,从大尺度输送条件和局地边界层动力作用分析了外来污染物水平传输、悬浮聚集和向下传输的过程,并解释了该地区观测到的午后PM2.5浓度特殊峰值的气象成因。结果表明,湖北重污染爆发以区域传输为主,地面观测PM2.5极值对应10 m风速可达8—10 m/s,边界层0—1 km为较强偏北风输送,污染传输通量极值位于400 m高度附近,为重要传输通道,低空无明显逆温,重污染过程具有“非静稳”边界层气象特征。重污染形成的大尺度输送条件为,长江中下游及北部地区偏北风异常偏强,南部地区风速减缓,使污染物在中游平原堆积,鄂北边界风速越大,越有利污染输送增长。传输性污染主要来自偏北和东北方向的污染源输送,潜在源区贡献主要为途经偏北通道上的豫中、南阳盆地和关中地区,以及途经东北通道上的鲁、皖、苏等部分地区。PM2.5浓度日变化双峰结构的天气成因不同,21—24时(北京时)峰值为静稳性污染,11—14时峰值为传输性污染。污染输送受大气边界层高度影响,日出前大气边界层高度较低,层结稳定并伴有上升运行,使得低空外来输送悬浮聚集在400 m高度附近;日出后随大气边界层高度升高,静稳层结被破坏,在干沉降作用下高浓度PM2.5开始向下传输,并在午后地面形成峰值。   相似文献   

3.
Severe haze pollution that occurred in January 2014 in Wuhan was investigated. The factors leading to Wuhan’s PM2.5 pollution and the characteristics and formation mechanism were found to be significantly different from other megacities, like Beijing. Both the growth rates and decline rates of PM2.5 concentrations in Wuhan were lower than those in Beijing, but the monthly PM2.5 value was approximately twice that in Beijing. Furthermore, the sharp increases of PM2.5 concentrations were often accompanied by strong winds. A high-precision modeling system with an online source-tagged method was established to explore the formation mechanism of five haze episodes. The long-range transport of the polluted air masses from the North China Plain (NCP) was the main factor leading to the sharp increases of PM2.5 concentrations in Wuhan, which contributed 53.4% of the monthly PM2.5 concentrations and 38.5% of polluted days. Furthermore, the change in meteorological conditions such as weakened winds and stable weather conditions led to the accumulation of air pollutants in Wuhan after the long-range transport. The contribution from Wuhan and surrounding cities to the PM2.5 concentrations was determined to be 67.4% during this period. Under the complex regional transport of pollutants from surrounding cities, the NCP, East China, and South China, the five episodes resulted in 30 haze days in Wuhan. The findings reveal important roles played by transregional and intercity transport in haze formation in Wuhan.  相似文献   

4.
苏州灰霾特征分析   总被引:10,自引:5,他引:5       下载免费PDF全文
利用苏州市2009年6月-2010年5月逐时的能见度、相对湿度、污染物(PM1o、PM2.5、黑碳)浓度和散射系数等资料进行灰霾的判识与统计分析,结果表明:苏州市灰霾日占全年天数的46.6%,雨日和“蓝天”分别占33.2%和21.9%.在苏州所有灰霾日中以轻微灰霾为主,占灰霾曰总数的70.6%,发生中度和重度灰霾的频率较小.灰霾出现频率的日变化规律表明白天出现灰霾的频率比夜间低,在5-8时灰霾出现的频率达到峰值,14-16时灰霾出现的频率最低.灰霾日的污染物浓度远大于非灰霾日,随着灰霾等级增大,黑碳浓度明显增大;除重度灰霾外,PM10和PM2.5浓度也明显增大;散射系数增大.  相似文献   

5.
We analyzed the structure and evolution of turbulent transfer and the wind profile in the atmospheric boundary layer in relation to aerosol concentrations during an episode of heavy haze pollution from 6 December 2016 to 9 January 2017. The turbulence data were recorded at Peking University’s atmospheric science and environment observation station. The results showed a negative correlation between the wind speed and the PM2.5 concentration. The turbulence kinetic energy was large and showed obvious diurnal variations during unpolluted (clean) weather, but was small during episodes of heavy haze pollution. Under both clean and heavy haze conditions, the relation between the non-dimensional wind components and the stability parameter z/L followed a 1/3 power law, but the normalized standard deviations of the wind speed were smaller during heavy pollution events than during clean periods under near-neutral conditions. Under unstable conditions, the normalized standard deviation of the potential temperature σ θ /|θ*| was related to z/L, roughly following a –1/3 power law, and the ratio during pollution days was greater than that during clean days. The three-dimensional turbulence energy spectra satisfied a –2/3 power exponent rate in the high-frequency band. In the low-frequency band, the wind velocity spectrum curve was related to the stability parameters under clear conditions, but was not related to atmospheric stratification under polluted conditions. In the dissipation stage of the heavy pollution episode, the horizontal wind speed first started to increase at high altitudes and then gradually decreased at lower altitudes. The strong upward motion during this stage was an important dynamic factor in the dissipation of the heavy haze.  相似文献   

6.
北京大气能见度的主要影响因子   总被引:4,自引:3,他引:1       下载免费PDF全文
利用北京市道面自动气象站、国家级自动气象站等多种观测数据分析北京地区2007—2015年能见度及其主要影响因子, 并挑选两次典型低能见度事件过程进行详细分析。从空间分布看, 北京西北地区能见度明显高于中心城区和东南大部地区。从时间分布看, 北京地区平均能见度最大值出现在5月, 最小值出现在7月; 日间的最低值多出现在06:00(北京时, 下同)左右, 冬季略向后推迟; 最高值多出现在16:00前后, 冬季略有提前。整体而言, 2007—2015年北京地区发生低能见度事件的概率为62.14%, 且发生低能见度的事件集中于1~5 km, 霾事件中干霾、湿霾的发生频率分别为86.13%和13.87%。能见度的主要影响因子为相对湿度、风速和PM2.5浓度。其中, 能见度与风速呈正相关, 与相对湿度和PM2.5浓度呈反相关。需要指出的是, 当相对湿度增加至80%, 能见度受PM2.5浓度的影响程度在下降, 而主要受相对湿度的影响。基于所选个例, 当北京地区出现湿霾事件时, 能见度的恶化程度远高于干霾事件, 且PM2.5浓度需比干霾事件时下降得更低才能有效改善能见度。  相似文献   

7.
We present mobile vehicle lidar observations in Tianjin, China during the spring, summer, and winter of 2016. Mobile observations were carried out along the city border road of Tianjin to obtain the vertical distribution characteristics of PM2.5. Hygroscopic growth was not considered since relative humidity was less than 60% during the observation experiments. PM2.5 profile was obtained with the linear regression equation between the particle extinction coefficient and PM2.5 mass concentration. In spring, the vertical distribution of PM2.5 exhibited a hierarchical structure. In addition to a layer of particles that gathered near the ground, a portion of particles floated at 0.6–2.5-km height. In summer and winter, the fine particles basically gathered below 1 km near the ground. In spring and summer, the concentration of fine particles in the south was higher than that in the north because of the influence of south wind. In winter, the distribution of fine particles was opposite to that measured during spring and summer. High concentrations of PM2.5 were observed in the rural areas of North Tianjin with a maximum of 350 μg m–3 on 13 December 2016. It is shown that industrial and ship emissions in spring and summer and coal combustion in winter were the major sources of fine particles that polluted Tianjin. The results provide insights into the mechanisms of haze formation and the effects of meteorological conditions during haze–fog pollution episodes in the Tianjin area.  相似文献   

8.
根据2007—2013年宁波市每日8次地面观测气象资料,运用罗氏法和统计分析法计算大气混合层高度,分析其在霾日和非霾日的不同日变化特征。结果表明宁波市霾日与非霾日混合层高度均呈白天高,夜晚低的日变化特征,夏季两者差值的日变化波动最明显,波峰时间比其他季节晚3 h。混合层高度日变化趋势与风速、气温、能见度趋于一致,霾等级越重,混合层高度越低。霾日与非霾日的气温差值除冬季呈正变温外,其他季节呈负变温,冬季14时差值最小,夜间加大,春夏季凌晨差值最小,14时最大,秋季波动不明显;风速差值除冬季夜间为正值外,其余季节为负值,秋冬季差值最小、夏季最大。大气处于不稳定状态时,混合层高度随着稳定度增加而逐渐处于稳定状态时,随着稳定度增加而降低,中性大气是宁波易致霾的大气层结。霾日与非霾日大气稳定度表现不一致,中午霾日中性大气占多数,非霾日则是不稳定大气;夜间霾日稳定—弱稳定大气和中性大气所占比例相当,非霾日稳定—弱稳定大气占多数。另外,PM_(2.5)浓度在霾日和非霾日均为白天低、夜间高的日变化特征,但霾日波动大,波峰时间晚于非霾日2 h,峰值浓度也高于非霾日2.7倍;早晨或下午到上半夜是霾日的PM_(2.5)浓度两个上升时段,上午为下降时段;非霾日的两个浓度缓升(降)时段分别出现凌晨和下午(上午和前半夜)。研究成果有助于预报员了解大气混合层高度及其对霾的可能影响,从而提高霾预报预警能力。  相似文献   

9.
北京不同区域气溶胶辐射效应   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1       下载免费PDF全文
采用大气辐射传输模式SES2以及2013年1月—2015年10月欧洲中期天气预报中心细网格再分析资料计算了北京地区4个观测站地面接收的短波辐射通量,分析了晴天和云天北京城郊气溶胶对总辐射的定量影响时空变化特征。结果表明:北京城区和近郊区气溶胶对总辐射的影响约为远郊区的2倍,北京南部和西部气溶胶对辐射的影响较大,晴天和云天北京城区和近郊区气溶胶对总辐射的削减值分别为146.23~180.99 W·m-2和202.11~217.02 W·m-2,晴天总辐射削减空间差异较大;秋冬季气溶胶对总辐射的影响明显大于春夏季,北京市观象台秋冬季气溶胶对总辐射的削减作用最大可达60%,较春夏季高10%~20%;北京城郊总辐射和直接辐射削减率与气溶胶光学厚度变化均呈线性关系,近地面PM2.5浓度对辐射的影响不容忽视。  相似文献   

10.
西安市霾天气与清洁天气变化特征及影响因素分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
利用2006-2012年西安市污染物质量浓度、气象站逐时地面风场、相对湿度和能见度等资料,依据霾天气的定义统计理论霾日数,对比人工观测霾日与判据统计理论霾日的合理性,通过对霾天气与清洁天气过程的气象条件分析,分析西安市霾天气与清洁天气过程的变化特征及影响因素。结果表明:2006-2012年西安市霾天气过程在干季发生频率较高,湿季发生较少。地面风场对霾天气过程影响较大,绝大部分霾天气过程的日平均风速<1.5 m·s-1;干季大部分霾天气过程日平均风速≤1.0 m·s-1,极端个例甚至在0.5 m·s-1以下。清洁天气过程在干季发生次数多于湿季,主要与干季风速较大和湿度较小相关。  相似文献   

11.
Due to increased aerosol emissions and unfavorable weather conditions, severe haze events have occurred frequently in China in the last 10 years. In addition, the interaction between the boundary layer and the aerosol radiative effect may be another important factor in haze formation. To better understand the effect of this interaction, the aerosol radiative effect on a severe haze episode that took place in December 2013 was investigated by using two WRF-Chem model simulations with different aerosol configurations. The results showed that the maximal reduction of regional average surface shortwave radiation, latent heat, and sensible heat during this event were 88, 12, and 37 W m–2, respectively. The planetary boundary layer height, daytime temperature, and wind speed dropped by 276 m, 1°C, and 0.33 m s–1, respectively. The ventilation coefficient dropped by 8%–24% for in the central and northwestern Yangtze River Delta (YRD). The upper level of the atmosphere was warmed and the lower level was cooled, which stabilized the stratification. In a word, the dispersion ability of the atmosphere was weakened due to the aerosol radiative feedback. Additional results showed that the PM2.5 concentration in the central and northwestern YRD increased by 6–18 μg m–3, which is less than 15% of the average PM2.5 concentration during the severely polluted period in this area. The vertical profile showed that the PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations increased below 950 hPa, with a maximum increase of 7 and 8 μg m–3, respectively. Concentrations reduced between 950 and 800 hPa, however, with a maximum reduction of 3.5 and 4.5 μg m–3, respectively. Generally, the aerosol radiative effect aggravated the level of pollution, but the effect was limited, and this haze event was mainly caused by the stagnant meteorological conditions. The interaction between the boundary layer and the aerosol radiative effect may have been less important than the large-scale static weather conditions for the formation of this haze episode.  相似文献   

12.
北京一次持续性雾霾过程的阶段性特征及影响因子分析   总被引:11,自引:1,他引:10  
利用北京地区高时间分辨率观测资料对2009年11月3—8日一次持续性雾霾天气过程中的气象因素和气溶胶演变特征进行了分析。结果表明,该次雾霾过程具有明显的阶段性特征,前期以霾为主,中期发展为雾霾交替,后期随着相对湿度减小再次转换为霾并最终消散。边界层逆温是低能见度过程形成的必要条件,但并不最终决定雾霾低能见度强度。相对湿度和PM2.5浓度是决定能见度大小的两个关键影响因子,对能见度的影响体现出阶段性特征。大部分时段PM2.5浓度是影响能见度的主要因子,当能见度小于1 km时,能见度变化更多受相对湿度影响。不同的情景计算表明,控制PM2.5浓度对于改善本次过程的能见度有重要作用。  相似文献   

13.
针对2013年1月江苏淮安地区发生的一次连续性雾霾天气过程,分析该天气过程中PM10和PM2.5的质量浓度演变特征、能见度与气象要素之间的关系、中低层环流特征以及污染物来源。结果表明:雾霾期间PM10和PM2.5质量浓度最低值出现在05:00至07:00(北京时间,下同)和13:00至17:00,最高值出现在21:00至23:00,PM10和PM2.5质量浓度并非同时达到极大值;持续变化较小的气压梯度、较低的风速、相对湿度的增大以及PM2.5和PM10质量浓度的增高是雾霾发生发展的必要条件;能见度与气压、相对湿度、PM2.5质量浓度的相关性较好,建立回归方程,对能见度的整体变化趋势拟合效果较好;高空环流形势平稳、中低层的暖平流、持续稳定少动的地面高压场分布为雾霾天气的持续发生发展提供了有利的形势背景;稳定的层结结构、中低层偏东及偏东北方向气团的输送、本地污染源以及严重的空气污染是此次过程中能见度偏低、霾天数较多的主要原因。  相似文献   

14.
文中对比分析了2015年29个雾、霾及雾霾混合天气过程中,章丘探空站L波段探空雷达和山东省气象局院内德国14通道地基微波辐射计观测的温度资料。对观测数据实施了质量控制,检验了精度和可信度,统计分析了宏观物理参量特征和日变化规律。针对雾、霾及雾霾天气过程各选取了一个个例进行分析,分析了大气中PM2.5、PM10、SO2、NO2、O3、CO含量的变化情况,分析了相对湿度、液态水路径和综合水汽含量等的变化情况。结果表明:两种观测数据一致性较好,拟合优度高于0.97;贴地逆温层存在一定的季节变化,悬垂逆温层存在一定的差异,逆温层的变化、污染参量变化与雾霾的形成有密切关系;不同天气背景对大气物理参量有较大的影响,PM10、AQI(空气质量指数)和CO均在相同时间段出现峰值,有明显的起伏;CO峰值雾霾天气中尤为明显,由早到晚随时间峰值逐渐增大,雾天和霾天峰值较小,雾霾天气明显大于雾天或霾天。  相似文献   

15.
广州地区旱季一次典型灰霾过程的特征及成因分析   总被引:18,自引:1,他引:17  
通过研究2009年11月广州市气溶胶颗粒物质量浓度(PM10、PM2.5、PM1)、黑碳浓度、散射系数(Scatter)等大气成分要素,以及微波辐射计、激光雷达及风廓线雷达所探测的风、温、湿等边界层结构,统计分析广州旱季一次典型灰霾过程(2009年11月23—29日)中气溶胶颗粒物及其光学特性的时空变化特征,并配合天气形势背景、边界层结构对其形成原因进行详细分析。在典型灰霾过程中,黑碳浓度高达58.7μg/m3,散射系数高达1 902.7 Mm-1,PM10浓度高达423.5μg/m3,PM2.5浓度高达355.7μg/m3,PM1浓度高达286.5μg/m3。通过对同期的气象条件分析表明在广州地区旱季,区域性污染过程,特别是灰霾天气的形成具有以下三种气象条件:大气边界层高度较低;高压变性出海的天气形势与之密切相关;在偏东和偏南气流带来的高湿度环境下,气溶胶吸湿增长效应显著,导致出现严重灰霾天气。  相似文献   

16.
面对日益严峻的大气污染形势,针对卫星气溶胶光学厚度(AOD)资料在灰霾数值预报领域的合理有效利用问题,使用WRF-Chem(WRF coupled with Chemistry)大气化学模式以及GSI(Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation)三维变分同化系统,利用MODIS和FY-3A/MERSI AOD资料,对一次灰霾天气过程进行了同化预报试验。试验结果显示,同化卫星AOD资料有效改善了模式初始场,MODIS和MERSI同化试验分别在AOD分析场的中心强度和空间分布各具优势,且对PM2.5和PM10的后续预报改进明显;从统计分析上看,同化试验的预报效果整体上好于控制试验,同化试验中PM2.5和PM10预报值的平均值、中值、平均偏差、均方根误差等指标均明显优于控制试验,且MODIS和MERSI同化试验分别在PM2.5和PM10预报统计结果中体现出了优势;卫星AOD资料同化能明显降低污染事件的空报率和漏报率,提高预报的TS评分和ETS评分。不同卫星AOD资料的差异对分析场中AOD的分布和强度产生了相应影响,进而影响了模式的灰霾预报效果;本次试验中,MODIS和MERSI AOD同化试验分别在PM2.5和PM10预报的评分上表现更佳。结果表明,卫星AOD资料同化对数值预报产生了积极的效果。   相似文献   

17.
A set of micro pulse lidar(MPL)systems operating at 532 nm was used for ground-based observation of aerosols in Shanghai in 2011.Three typical particulate pollution events(e.g.,haze)were examined to determine the evolution of aerosol vertical distribution and the planetary boundary layer(PBL)during these pollution episodes.The aerosol vertical extinction coefficient(VEC)at any given measured altitude was prominently larger during haze periods than that before or after the associated event.Aerosols originating from various source regions exerted forcing to some extent on aerosol loading and vertical layering,leading to different aerosol vertical distribution structures.Aerosol VECs were always maximized near the surface owing to the potential influence of local pollutant emissions.Several peaks in aerosol VECs were found at altitudes above 1 km during the dust-and bioburning-influenced haze events.Aerosol VECs decreased with increasing altitude during the local-polluted haze event,with a single maximum in the surface atmosphere.PM2.5 increased slowly while PBL and visibility decreased gradually in the early stages of haze events;subsequently,PM2.5 accumulated and was exacerbated until serious pollution bursts occurred in the middle and later stages.The results reveal that aerosols from different sources impact aerosol vertical distributions in the atmosphere and that the relationship between PBL and pollutant loadings may play an important role in the formation of pollution.  相似文献   

18.
利用欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)数值预报产品和动态统计预报方法,对北京、天津、石家庄等14个京津冀重点城市雾霾与空气污染进行定量化的中期预报试验,包括对首要污染物PM2.5浓度和能见度的逐时定量化预报及雾霾现象的客观化判断,并对2015年10月1日-2016年11月10日试验预报效果进行了检验评估。检验结果显示:该方法对北京及周边城市未来10 d逐时和逐日能见度、PM2.5浓度及雾霾现象的预报值与观测值之间具有显著正相关系数、较高的误差减少量和TS评分等,表明基于ECMWF数值预报产品和动态统计预报方法的京津冀雾霾污染中期定量化预报技术整体上具有较高的可靠性、稳定性与预报技巧性。此外,检验指标还显示出该动态统计预报方法对能见度的预报效果要略优于PM2.5浓度预报,同时对霾的预报准确率高于对雾的预报。个例分析显示,该动态统计预报方法能提前5~6 d预报出北京地区典型持续性雾霾污染的发展过程,对持续性雾霾的提前预报预警具有较好的参考意义。  相似文献   

19.
依据一种基于建筑用地比例和土地利用信息熵的城乡站点划分方法,将西安市环境与气象站点划分为城区、郊区和两类乡村站,讨论其PM2.5的城乡分布特征及与城市热岛效应强度(Urban Heat Island Intensity,UHII)间的相关关系。结果表明,不同季节西安市呈现不同的PM2.5城乡分布特征和日变化特征,两类乡村站点PM2.5差异明显且下风向乡村站点(乡村D)对应的UHIID对城区和乡村的影响程度大于上风向乡村站点(乡村U)对应的UHIIU。在城区较多本地排放的影响下,乡村PM2.5浓度与 UHIIU(或UHIID)相关系数均大于城区。随着UHIID的增加,城乡PM2.5相对浓度差值(RUPIID)整体呈下降趋势且UHIID与RUPIID在春夏秋季显著负相关。UHIID增大,城区近地面PM2.5的水平扩散能力减弱,但PM2.5的垂直扩散能力较乡村更强,从而UHIID通过影响PM2.5的传输扩散特征,进一步影响西安市RUPIID。  相似文献   

20.
不同降水强度对PM2.5的清除作用及影响因素   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1       下载免费PDF全文
云和降水过程是大气污染物的重要清除途径,但由于降水过程和大气污染颗粒物本身的复杂性,目前降水过程对大气污染物的清除机制及影响因素有待深入研究。该文利用2014年3月—2016年7月在北京地区连续观测的PM2.5和降水数据,研究了不同降水强度对PM2.5的清除率,以及雨滴谱、风速和降水持续时间对PM2.5清除率的影响。研究表明:降水强度越大,对PM2.5清除效率越高。小雨、中雨和大雨对PM2.5清除率平均值分别为5.1%,38.5%和50.6%。小雨不但对PM2.5的清除率最低,而且对PM2.5的清除效果也存在很大差异,约50%的小雨个例中PM2.5质量浓度出现减小情况,而另外50%的小雨个例中,PM2.5质量浓度出现增加情况。在持续时间长或地面风速增大的情况下,小雨也表现出较高的清除率。在中雨和大雨情况下,PM2.5质量浓度均出现明显减小情况。但降水持续时间和风速对中雨和大雨的清除率影响较小,这是由于中雨和大雨一般在较短时间内即可清除大部分PM2.5,因此,对降水的持续时间和风速大小不敏感。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号